Isolating x in Rate of Reaction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mwall
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To isolate x in the rate of reaction equation, start by combining the constants to simplify the expression. The equation can be rewritten as e^(ax) = b, where a is the combined constant and b is the fraction. Taking the logarithm of both sides allows for the rearrangement to x = log(b)/a. This method effectively clarifies the steps needed to solve for x. Understanding how to manipulate exponential equations is crucial in these types of problems.
mwall
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am working on a problem relating to rate of reaction. I am not sure how to isolate the x in the following equation.

e^-45/(8.31)(x)
e^-45/(8.31)(353)

mwall
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Sorry, I forgot the rest of the equation.

.072 = e^-(45/8.31*x)
.002 e^-(45/8.31*352)

mwall
 
Whenever you're not sure how to proceed with rearranging an expression like that one the first thing you should do is to "fold" the constants together. If you do so then it is simply expressed as,

e^{ax} = b.

So obviously you just need to take logs of both sides to get,

x = \frac{\log(b)}{a}
 
Last edited:
the first thing you should do is to "fold" the constants together

This can be done by remembering e^a / e^b = e^{a-b}
 
Thanks for your help.

mwall
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top