Isotope Half-Life and Sample Size Calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter AryRezvani
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay Isotope
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the initial size of a sample of isotope 239Pu, which has a half-life of 24,100 years, after it has reduced by 1.6 grams over 10,000 years. The user attempts to solve the equation A = Ao * e^(-rt) but struggles with algebraic manipulation, particularly taking the natural logarithm of a negative number. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly applying the half-life concept and suggest re-evaluating the algebra to avoid confusion. They highlight that the equation should incorporate the half-life factor and clarify the steps needed to isolate the initial mass. Accurate calculations are essential for determining the sample size after specified time intervals.
AryRezvani
Messages
65
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The isotope 239Pu has a half-life of 24,100 years. After 10,000 years, a sample of the isotope is reduced 1.6 grams. What was the intial size of the same (in grams)? How large was the sample after the first 1,000 years. Round your answer to four decimal places.

Homework Equations



A=Aoert

The Attempt at a Solution



Intially, for the value of A, I subbed in "Ao-1.6" and then did the following:

Ao-1.6=Aoer10,000

Divided each side by Ao, and then take the Ln of both sides.

That's where I get stuck. My calculator is indicating that it's not possible to take the Ln of a negative number.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you get a negative number after your algebraic manipulation?
 
SteamKing said:
How did you get a negative number after your algebraic manipulation?

The final isotope is the initial mass - 1.6.

When you divide by Ao, the negative stays there, right?
 
AryRezvani said:
The final isotope is the initial mass - 1.6.

When you divide by Ao, the negative stays there, right?

You'd better show your algebra, exactly. You seem to be making an elementary mistake.
 
It's not clear (to me) what you're solving for. What is r? Since you're given a half-life, shouldn't there be a power of two involved? And a negative power of two at that.
 
You might find it easier to solve for the exponential part, THEN just gather the A0 together on one side (and yes, don't forget that the equation should be A0-1.6 = A0e-rt/ln2
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top