Issue with book's solution for a block projected up an....

  • Thread starter Thread starter CVRIV
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem in a physics book regarding the velocity of a block projected upwards. The user initially struggled with the book's solution, which provided a velocity of 2.5 m/s, while their calculations led to non-real results due to a negative value under the square root. Upon further examination, the user realized they had mistakenly used a mass of 5 kg instead of the correct 0.5 kg and failed to square the x variable. Interestingly, despite these errors, they still arrived at the correct answer for part A. The user expressed gratitude for the assistance received in clarifying their confusion.
CVRIV
Messages
12
Reaction score
5
Hello everyone:) I'm having an issue with an example problem in the book I'm using.

I attached a pic of the problem and the book's solution.

The issue I'm having is that I have no idea how the book got the velocity it did via the solution it presented. When I worked out the problem myself, before looking at the book's solution, I arrived at the very same solution, but I was receiving non-real results, because the magnitude within the square root is negative. That's when I peaked at the book only to find that the book did what I did, except the book has 2.5m/s. I have no idea how it came to that.

I didn't want to just write that down without having some kind of explanation. Can you help me out? Is the book wrong? Am I wrong? What am I missing here?
 

Attachments

  • 0316190142~2.jpg
    0316190142~2.jpg
    90.7 KB · Views: 322
  • 0316190142c~2.jpg
    0316190142c~2.jpg
    21.2 KB · Views: 298
Physics news on Phys.org
CVRIV said:
same solution, but I was receiving non-real results, because the magnitude within the square root is negative
I do not see how you got that from the expression in the solution. Did you forget that (-x)2 is +x2?
Please post your working.
 
I figured out what I did wrong. I was using a mass of 5kg instead of 0.5kg.

The crazy thing is that I acquired the correct value for part A using the wrong amount of mass! What happened was I didn't square the x variable so with those two mistakes, I got the right answer. Ha ha.

Thanks for your help.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top