It's not potential energy but energy potential->

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a unique equation: EP=FD, which suggests a relationship between energy (E), its potential (P), geometric distance (D), and force (F). The equation implies that extreme values of force and energy correspond to extreme values of geometric potential. It emphasizes that energy potential is not measured in joules, nor is force measured in meters, indicating a conceptual framework rather than a conventional physical one. Additionally, a side note mentions the Earth's magnetic poles being reversed, comparing their interaction to that of a magnet, where North meets South. This adds an intriguing layer to the discussion, linking physical concepts with geomagnetic phenomena.
deda
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
I won't explain my reasons for thinking this way.
It won't make any difference at all if I do.
The equation is:

EP=FD

It reads:
"Energy times its potential equals to geometrix times its potential".
Accordingly, if when the force and energy are extreme at the same time then the geometrix and the energy potential are extreme at the same time.Energy potential doesn't measure in Jules just like force doesn't measure in meters.
----------------------------------------
E=energy
P=potential of energy
D=equi. distance i.e. geometrix
F=potential of D i.e. force
----------------------------------------
What ever you think about it...

Post it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LOL this sounds familair

did you know that the Earth's North and South Poles and inReverse ?

making the South=North and the North-South

compare it to a magnet and see N meets with S. :)
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Inclined treadmills and Galilean Invariance'

This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

Gravitational potential energy -- Why is it always negative?
Replies
10
Views
3K
Regarding the idea of potential energy
Replies
2
Views
1K
Potential Energy: Rigorous Understanding & E=mc²
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Change of coordinates in a potential energy field
Replies
2
Views
1K
I How to interpret this definition of potential energy?
Replies
10
Views
2K
Potential energy of a dipole in an external field
Replies
4
Views
1K
"External" potential energies strike back
Replies
6
Views
1K
Physics C: Mechanics - Negative Energy and Potential Energy Curves
Replies
5
Views
2K
Meaning of potential energy in external fields
Replies
19
Views
2K
Conservative forces, Nonconservative forces and Potential Energy
Replies
9
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top