Japanese Megaliths: Man-Made or Nature-Made?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the origins of megalithic structures, debating whether they are man-made or natural formations. Participants express interest in the economic implications of constructing such large stones, suggesting a study to estimate historical population sizes based on the labor required for these projects. The conversation also touches on the geological factors that could lead to monuments being submerged, such as rising sea levels or land subsidence due to earthquakes, particularly in Japan. There is skepticism about the natural formation of certain shapes, with some participants hoping for further excavation to uncover tool marks that could indicate human involvement. The dialogue also references broader themes, such as Intelligent Design Theory and the notion of lost civilizations, hinting at the impact of these findings on historical narratives.
Messages
19,777
Reaction score
10,732
Man made or nature made? What are the implications?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMMBLNJqw1M
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I wasn't able to figure out what you're talking about via Google; could you post a link, please?

In the course of looking, though, I came across this interesting page: "The largest cut-stones of all time" which seems to be well-cited. I find it interesting because I had thought that most of the megaliths of this size were in Egypt, but I guess not.

It occurs to me that it would be an interesting study to do an economic analysis based on them: to use the various proposed methods for cutting and moving these stones, covert that to something like a Gross Domestic Product, and use that to try to reverse-engineer the population sizes that would have been necessary to support these projects, then correlate that to other methods of estimating population size in each area at the time.
 
There is two ways a monument can end up under water. Either the sea level raises, or then the land descends. There are lot of Earth quakes in Japan, so descending land somewhere there doesn't sound impossible to me.
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
Watch the video.

Oops, sorry, I have a crappy overactive ad blocker and I couldn't see it at first.

Interesting. At first I was saying, "I've seen rocks that cleave like that!" but then the camera moved across a 45° angle.

jostpuur said:
There is two ways a monument can end up under water. Either the sea level raises, or then the land descends. There are lot of Earth quakes in Japan, so descending land somewhere there doesn't sound impossible to me.

Possibility #3: it was built by mer-men! Aquaman was actually Japanese!
 
That's a fascinating discovery. I hope there will be a good deal of effort to excavate.
 
First time I saw it, I immediately thought it was just bassalt collums. However, some of the other regular shapes, like the "square-cut" openeing in one video, make me uncertain.

Sidenote; I was just havign a discussion with someone about whether or not "Intelligent Design Theory" is actual science. This debate about the monolyths came to mind.
 
This changes everything we ever thought!

There was no Lost Civilisation of Atlantis, there was a Lost Civilisation of Pacifis.
 
I hope they find some tool marks in the stone, othwise it will be claimed as a quirk of nature.
 
  • #10
It is claimed to be a quirk of nature.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
108
Replies
1
Views
777
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
194
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top