Jordan wigner transform and periodic boundary condition

wdlang
Messages
306
Reaction score
0
i think jordan wigner transform, when applied to open boundary system, can simplify a spin 1/2 system to a free fermion system

but there is a difficulty in the case of periodic boundary condition

in this case, we have to deal with terms like

S_N^+S_1^-=(-)^{\sum_{k=1}^{N-1}n_k} a_N^\dagger a_1

the phase term cannot drop out!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
E.H. Lieb, T.D. Schultz, and D.C. Mattis, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 16, 407 (1961).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(61)90115-4
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I thought Nielson's would help you!
http://www.qinfo.org/people/nielsen/blog/archive/notes/fermions_and_jordan_wigner.pdf
Yes, it is just an idea, you should calculate it by youself!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
And I cannot understand the relationship between the periodicity(periodic boundary or antiperiodic boundary) and the parity!
 
peteratcam said:
E.H. Lieb, T.D. Schultz, and D.C. Mattis, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 16, 407 (1961).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(61)90115-4

yes, they also have to deal with this problem

but to my surprise, they can handle it!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top