Joule's Apparatus and Kinetic Energy

AI Thread Summary
Joule's apparatus demonstrates the conversion of potential energy into internal energy through the stirring of water by falling blocks. As the blocks fall, their kinetic energy is reduced due to the presence of water, which also gains rotational kinetic energy. The experimental design must account for these factors, including calorimetry issues, to accurately measure energy transformations. Joule's work showed that the mechanical energy deficit aligns with the observed heat increase in water, challenging the calorimic theory of heat. This experiment is significant in understanding the relationship between mechanical energy and heat.
Bennigan88
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
In my textbook, Joule's apparatus (two blocks falling from height h turn a paddle that stirs and increases the internal energy of water) is claimed to convert the potential energy of the two blocks into internal energy that can be measured by the increase in temperature of the water... but what happens to the kinetic energy of the blocks as they are falling? They have velocity and mass so there must be kinetic energy, how is that accounted for in the setup of the apparatus?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That has to be factored into the experimental design and the final calculation of course. If your book claimed that all the falling energy becomes heat then your book is in error - but I suspect they do not make such a claim.

The kinetic energy of the blocks is less than if there was no water... they fall slower.
The water also gains rotational kinetic energy, and there are issues with calorimetry.
All these can be taken into account in a careful setup. Joule worked out the mechanical energy deficit and demonstrated that this was consistent with the heat increase in the water. The experiment more easily disproves the, then accepted, calorimic theory of heat that treated heat as a substance in it's own right.
See also:
http://www.eoearth.org/article/On_the_Mechanical_Equivalent_of_Heat_(historical)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top