Judging force and pressure before a practical

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the maximum force or pressure one can exert based on previous lifting experiences is complex due to various factors like technique, fatigue, and muscle recruitment. While there are calculators available that estimate maximum lifting capacity based on weights lifted multiple times, these are only approximations and may not accurately reflect individual limits. The discussion highlights the difference between biological systems and mechanical structures, emphasizing that human strength is influenced by more variables. Users are encouraged to explore these calculators for rough estimations to aid in understanding their lifting potential. Ultimately, precise predictions for individual lifting capacity remain challenging.
Physics quest
Messages
88
Reaction score
5
Ok, I am wondering if its possible for me to calculate how much force or pressure I can take from carrying or moving something based on what I can already move. Is it possible to predict how much pressure I can take on my hands, or how much I can potentially create?

For example (not necesserily real figuires of what I am capable of, I am just making an example);

lets say I can easily lift, let's say 50 pounds without a problem, is it possible to find out without lifting anything else, how much I could logically lift before I have to struggle? Its the same with moving say, heavy boxes or crates. I can quite easily flip over, push X amount of weight, let's say 100kg, but if I wanted to actually lift the box off the ground is it possible to find out how much effort it would take me? given the weight of the object and how I moved it before.

I assuming now there's probably no way to find out, but there must be some way of finding out how much pressure something can take before it breaks or how much strength a bridge has before its supports cannot take anymore. Physical engineering I am assume has a way of finding out how strong supports have to be, beforehand to hold up X amount of bridge and weight of vehicles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is that biological systems have a lot more to them than mechanical ones. For instance your ability to lift a weight depends not only on your strength but also your technique, your fatigue and your ability to recruit type I muscle fibers or a higher number of motor units (something gained through practice). There are calculators that attempt to predict your maximum from a weight you can lift a maximum of 3, 5, 10 etc times but they are simply estimations; knowing you can lift something easily doesn't really tell you what your maximum is, I'm sure we could all lift 50 pounds with ease but our maximums will likely be widely spread.
 
Hm, can you point me/link me to any of those calculators? I don't need to be dead spot on but if there's any that can give me some form or estimation maybe it could help me.

Thanks.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Similar threads

I Calculating Force Applied to an Object of 100kg Moved 1m in 5s
Replies
12
Views
2K
When a bird flaps it's wings up, doesn't the pressure drop below?
Replies
14
Views
3K
B How Does Inclined Load Affect Weight Distribution When Moving a Cabinet?
Replies
1
Views
1K
"Air Pressure" is not "the weight of the air above you"
Replies
27
Views
4K
B How hydraulic pressure can change the magnitude of a force?
Replies
7
Views
322
I Force Required for Gas Struts on 1972 VW T2 Danbury Pop top campervan?
Replies
9
Views
2K
Rocket propulsion explained only through pressure differential
Replies
46
Views
5K
I Sound pressure and inverse distance law
Replies
5
Views
2K
B What forces are required to tumble a block?
Replies
16
Views
2K
I Why does the main muscle use the most energy in body movements?
Replies
24
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top