Jupiter-sized Planet Lurking in Oort Cloud?

AI Thread Summary
Recent discussions suggest the possibility of a Jupiter-sized planet in the Oort cloud, prompted by cometary deflections and observations of Sedna. However, most solar system astronomers reject this notion, asserting that the dynamics of the solar system can be explained by known celestial bodies. The adjustment of Neptune's mass following Voyager's flyby resolved previous discrepancies in Uranus' orbit, further diminishing the likelihood of a hidden planet. The unexplained eccentricity of Sedna is acknowledged by astronomers, who admit that the answer remains unknown, contrasting with the media's preference for sensational explanations. Ultimately, speculation about a Jupiter-sized planet lacks substantial scientific backing and is often fueled by a desire for attention rather than evidence.
sanman
Messages
737
Reaction score
24
Lately I've read some articles about the possibility of a Jupiter-sized planet hidden in the Oort cloud.

This assertion is based on analysis of cometary deflections and observations of Sedna.

What is the likelihood of this?

We all know that there must be lots of planet-sized stuff out there besides Sedna, but Jupiter-sized?
If Neptune and Uranus have been known for so long, then how could a Jupiter-sized planet remain undetected for all this time?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The consensus among most solar system astronomers is "No". They have pretty much nailed the dynamics of the solar system pretty using just the known bodies in the solar system. The last nail in the Planet X coffin was an adjustment to Neptune's mass based on the very well-observed flyby of Voyager. Before this adjustment, there was a small unexplained discrepancy in Uranus' orbit.

Every branch of science has its share of not-quite woo-woos, astronomy included. The news media likes the woo-woos more than the boring non-woo-woos. The non-woo-woos are boring.

The best current answer of Sedna's currently unexplained eccentricity is that we don't know. Most astronomers say just that. A well-reasoned "we don't know" does not sit well with journalists. They want a sensationalistic answer to help garner readers. More readers = more $$ from advertisers. Anything beyond "we don't know" is baseless conjecture. Some fringish astronomers like to make baseless conjectures, partly because the newsies eat that stuff up.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top