MHB Kate's Chances of Winning a 5 Match Tennis Tournament

AI Thread Summary
Kate has an 80% probability of winning each tennis match. In a 5-match knockout tournament, her chance of winning the tournament is calculated as 0.8^5, resulting in approximately 33%. If she wins her first three matches, the probability of winning the tournament remains the same, as winning all five matches includes winning the first three. The discussion clarifies that the intersection of winning the first three and winning all five is simply winning all five matches. Therefore, the probability calculations reinforce that winning all five matches is the only way to satisfy both conditions.
Bushy
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
The Probability of Kate winning a tennis match is 80%. If she enters a 5 match knockout tournament, find the chance of her:

a) winning the tournament:


Is simply 0.8^5 = 33%

b) winning the tournament given she wins her first three games:

Is the intersection of the two over the probability she wins the first three = 0.8^5 * 0.8^3 / 0.8^3 = the same as part a?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Bushy said:
The Probability of Kate winning a tennis match is 80%. If she enters a 5 match knockout tournament, find the chance of her:

a) winning the tournament:


Is simply 0.8^5 = 33%

Keep your answer exact please. $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left( \frac{4}{5} \right) ^5 = \frac{1024}{3125} \end{align*}$.

b) winning the tournament given she wins her first three games:

Is the intersection of the two over the probability she wins the first three = 0.8^5 * 0.8^3 / 0.8^3 = the same as part a?

No, winning all five and winning the first three is equivalent to simply winning all five. So the intersection is simply what you found in part (a).
 
Prove It said:
No, winning all five and winning the first three is equivalent to simply winning all five. So the intersection is simply what you found in part (a).

Therefore 0.8^3 / 0.8^3 = 1 ?
 
Bushy said:
Therefore 0.8^3 / 0.8^3 = 1 ?

NO! The top is the probability of winning all FIVE!
 
Well that would give a neat answer, but aren't we saying the intersection of winning the first three and winning all five should be winning the 1st three?
 
Bushy said:
Well that would give a neat answer, but aren't we saying the intersection of winning the first three and winning all five should be winning the 1st three?

No, the only way it is possible to do both "winning all five games" and "winning the first three games" is to win all five games!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top