KCL and First order circuit theory

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) in analyzing first-order circuits, particularly when a switch opens. Participants explore the implications of current direction on the resulting differential equations for voltage across a capacitor and resistor in two different nodes.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents two different differential equations derived from KCL for two nodes, questioning the validity of the second equation given that KCL should not depend on current direction.
  • Another participant asserts that the current direction is crucial, as the capacitor voltage drives the current through the resistor, impacting the charge on the capacitor.
  • A participant acknowledges the correctness of the first equation but questions whether the second equation could also be considered valid despite being incorrect in context.
  • Another participant critiques the current directions used in the equations, suggesting that the equations presented are not sound and provides reasoning based on charge conservation and the relationship between current, voltage, and charge.
  • A request is made for clarification on the correct equations for both nodes, indicating a desire for further understanding of the derivations involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of the equations derived from KCL, with some asserting that current direction matters while others question the implications of this on the equations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correctness of the second equation and the implications of current direction.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of current direction and the implications of KCL in this context. The discussion also highlights potential limitations in the participants' understanding of the relationships between voltage, current, and charge in the circuit.

raddian
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
My question applies to the case when the switch opens. By applying KCL in order to get a first order diff equation, the following problem arises when I choose different current directions (which shouldn't happen because KCL says the current direction doesn't matter because it will be fixed after all is said and done.

So the first one (NODE A) has

v/(RC) + dv/dt = 0 whose solution is $$Ke^{^{\frac{-t}{RC}}}$$

while the next case (NODE B) has
v/(RC) - dv/dt = 0 whose solution is $$Ke^{^{\frac{t}{RC}}}$$

I know the correct form is the first one, with a -t for the argument but doesn't a KCL "ignore" current direction and should then produce the solution, regardless of direction?

Am I missing something?
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
raddian said:
Am I missing something?
Yes. When you have only a capacitor and a resistor in the circuit, the capacitor voltage drives a current through the resistor. This current reduces the capacitor charge.
 
r I understand your point. Because the form tells me I have a decaying voltage, I need to have a negative argument to e. I need to apologize for not making my question very clear. I know the first form is correct (Node A) but is the second form equally valid but incorrect? And because they are equally valid, the only reason to choose the method of Node A vs. the method of Node b is because the argument of e should be negative?
 
Your current arrows are correct in Node B (and wrong in node A). Your equations are shaky.

Consider: With no external source, the current through R is sourced by the voltage across the capacitor. So in a time interval Δt, the current I removes a charge Q = I⋅Δt from the capacitor. Combine that with I = V/R and Q=C⋅V.
 
Can you please explain what are the correct equations for node A and B?
 
raddian said:
Can you please explain what are the correct equations for node A and B?
I thought I spelled it out quite clearly (and if I just show you the formula, a moderator may delete it). That aside:
[tex]I=\frac{V}{R}=-\frac{dQ}{dt}[/tex] since current leaving the capacitor reduces the charge in the capacitor. Now insert the capacitor formula (Q=C⋅V): [tex]I=\frac{V}{R}=-\frac{dQ}{dt}=-C\frac{dV}{dt}[/tex] and you have your equation for V.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
8K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K