Kepler's laws and orbits question?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kratos321
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laws Orbits
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the gravitational field strength at the surface of an imaginary planet with a diameter twice that of Earth. Given the moon's orbital radius and period, the user applies Kepler's laws and gravitational equations to derive the gravitational constant (GM) and subsequently the gravitational field strength (g). The calculated value of g is approximately 40,597,576.67 N/kg, which is deemed excessively high, prompting the user to question the accuracy of their calculations. Responses confirm that the calculations appear correct, highlighting the extreme nature of the planet's gravity. The conversation emphasizes the implications of such a high gravitational field on potential habitation.
Kratos321
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An imaginary planet has a diameter twice that of our earth. The planet has one moon with an orbital radius of 5.0x10^7 km and orbital period of 10 Earth days.
Determine the strength of the gravitational field at the surface of the planet.

Radius of Earth = 6.38 x 10^6m
Orbital radius of moon = 5x10^10m
orbital period = 8.64 x 10^5 s

Homework Equations



r^3/T^2 = GM/4pi^2
g = GM/r^2

i think that's all..?...

The Attempt at a Solution



GM = (4pi^2(5x10^10)^3)/(8.64x10^5)^2
= 6.61 x 10^21

g = 6.61x10^21/(12.76x10^6)^2
= 40597576.67N/kg

this number is massive! I must be doing something wrong. any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your calculation looks fine. I wouldn't want to live there!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top