Kepler's Laws, mysterious equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gib Z
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laws
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the ratio of the speeds of a comet at aphelion and perihelion, given that the sectors of its elliptical orbit have equal areas and a radius ratio of 1:5. Participants express uncertainty about applying Kepler's laws to find the arc lengths necessary for calculating speed ratios. An equation presented, "Area = Rv," is debated for its accuracy and derivation, with some affirming its validity for infinitesimal sectors at the extremes of the orbit. The complexities of the comet's elliptical path are acknowledged, emphasizing that the equation may not hold in general cases. The conversation highlights a shared interest in understanding the underlying principles of orbital mechanics.
Gib Z
Homework Helper
Messages
3,341
Reaction score
7
I got a question that depicted the elliptical orbit of a comet over two intervals of the orbit, covering sectors, with the sun at a foci. It is given that the ratio of the "radii of the sectors" are 12:60 = 1:5. It is given the sectors have equal area, what is the ratio of the speeds of the comet at the aphelion to the perihelion.

First of all, yes it would be interesting to know how to solve that. I can't see any direct application of Kepler's laws that would help. Equal areas, so equal time taken, so the ratio of the velocities will just be the ratio of the arc lengths covered, how do we find that out?

Also, on the solutions page, it automatically starts with some equation, " Area = Rv", and using that equation it easily works out the ratio to be 1:5. I am really interested to find out how they got that equation? Is that exact or just an approximation? Is it even correct?

Thanks for helping out guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gib Z said:
Also, on the solutions page, it automatically starts with some equation, " Area = Rv", and using that equation it easily works out the ratio to be 1:5. I am really interested to find out how they got that equation? Is that exact or just an approximation? Is it even correct?

Hi Gib Z! :smile:

I haven't worked out the picture of the main question …:confused:

but the equation "Area/time = Rv" is true for an infinitesimal sector at perihelion and aphelion …

area/time = r(r + ∆r)∆θ/∆t ~ r²dθ/dt = rv. :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
area/time = r(r + ∆r)∆θ/∆t ~ r²dθ/dt = rv. :smile:

I'm not sure your equation is correct here. The orbit of the comet is not a circle. Hence in general we cannot say that rdθ/dt = v. What I understand is that in general.

\vec{v}= \dot{r}\hat{r} + r\dot{\theta}\hat{\theta}

However if the comet is at the aphelion or perihelion, your equation is true.
 
matematikawan said:
However if the comet is at the aphelion or perihelion, your equation is true.
tiny-tim said:
but the equation "Area/time = Rv" is true for an infinitesimal sector at perihelion and aphelion …

Great minds think alike! :biggrin:
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top