Calculating Minimum Deceleration and Meeting Heights in Kinematics

AI Thread Summary
To determine the minimum deceleration required for a car traveling at 29.6 m/s to reduce its average speed to within the speed limit of 19.4 m/s over a distance of 116 meters, kinematic equations can be applied. The average speed formula and distance equations are crucial in calculating the necessary deceleration. For the second problem, involving two stones thrown vertically, the time difference and initial velocities must be analyzed to find the height at which they meet. The equations provided can help establish relationships between distance, time, and acceleration. Clarification and guidance on applying these equations are needed to solve both problems effectively.
~SPaRtaN~
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(1) A speed trap is set up with two pressure activated strips placed across a highway, 116 meters apart. A car is speeding along at 29.6 meters per second, while the speed limit is only 19.4 meters per second. At the instant the car activates the first strip, the driver begins slowing down. What minimum deceleration (magnitude only) is needed so that the driver's average speed is within the limit by the time the car crosses the second strip?

(2)Suppose you throw a stone straight up with an initial velocity of 29.5 m/s and, 4.5 s later you throw a second stone straight up with the same initial velocity. The first stone going down will meet the second stone going up. At what height above the point of release do the two stones meet

Homework Equations



v(final) = v(initial) + at
x(final) = x(initial) + v(initial)*t + 1/2 at^2
x(final) - x(initial) = 1/2 [v(final) - v(initial)]*t
2a[x(final) - x(initial)] = v(final)^2 - v(initial)^2


The Attempt at a Solution


Couldn't get the right answer, tried 2 times
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might begin with these two equations:

d = \frac{1}{2} a t2

where a and t are unknown, and

vavg = \frac{vfinal + vinitial}{2}

where vfinal is unknown but can be written in terms of vinitial, a and t.
 
^ i tried but lost somewhere...its too confusing for me
 
anybody to help on these problems...just 1 day left
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top