Kinematics of 2-D Ball Rolling Off Table

AI Thread Summary
A ball rolls off a 1.90 m high table and lands 1.57 m away horizontally. The discussion revolves around calculating the time the ball was in the air and its speed upon leaving the table. The initial attempt involved using the quadratic equation, but the setup was incorrect, leading to confusion about the results. After reevaluating, the user switched to kinematic equations to find the correct answer. The thread highlights the importance of correctly setting up equations in physics problems.
jedjj
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
2-D kinematics[solved]

Homework Statement


A ball rolls horizontally off the edge of a tabletop that is 1.90 m high. It strikes the floor at a point 1.57 m horizontally away from the table edge. (Neglect air resistance.)

(a) How long was the ball in the air?

(b) What was its speed at the instant it left the table?


2. The attempt at a solution

I have been trying to get the answer to part a for a little while now. I have been trying to use the quadratic equation to find time knowing that 0=(-\Delta y)+V_{0y}*t+(g)t^2
I have not used quadratic equation in about 4 years. Am I setting this problem up correctly when I do

t=\frac{V_{0y}+\sqrt{V_{0y}^2-(4)(-\Delta y)(g)}}{2*(g)}
which should give me
t=\frac{{0}+\sqrt{0^2-(4)(-1.9)(g)}}{2*(g)}
t=\frac{\sqrt{-(4)(-1.9)(g)}}{2*(g)}

which comes to be
t=\frac{8.63}{19.6}
t=0.4403
I am not coming up with the correct answer according to what it is online[edit:still]. What am I doing wrong? Thanks for all the help.

[edit] I just went ahead and used kinematic equations and found the answer, but I'm still confused why the quadratic equation didn't work.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
To start I just realized that quadratic equation is not set up properly. I will edit the equation and set it up in the way that I believe is proper.
 
Am I giving too much information, or not enough. or is no one seeing a mistake I am making?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top