Kinematics Plane and Rocket Problem

AI Thread Summary
A plane flying at 12.0 km altitude at 850 km/h drops a rocket that falls briefly before its motor ignites, providing a constant acceleration of 3.00g at a 30-degree angle. The rocket must be at least 1.00 km ahead of the plane when it ascends through the altitude. The calculations involve determining the rocket's free fall time and horizontal motion relative to the plane. Initial attempts to calculate the time resulted in an unrealistic negative value, indicating a potential error in the approach. The discussion emphasizes the need for accurate application of kinematics equations and proper consideration of relative velocities.
majorazero
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Some plane is flying at an altitude of 12.0 km above sea level and is flying in a straight line at 850km/h. The plane then drops a rocket. After the drop the plane maintains the same altitude and speed and continues to fly in a straight line. The rocket falls for a brief time, after which its motor turns on and the combined effects of thrust and gravity gives the rocket a constant acceleration of 3.00g directed at an angle of 30 degrees above the horizontal. For reasons of safety, the rocket should at least be 1.00 kn in front of the plane when it climbs through the airline's altitude. Determine the minimum time that the rocket must fall before its engine starts. You can ignore air resistance.


Homework Equations


I used the basic three kinematics equation:
v = v+at
v^2 = v^2 + 2ax
x = vt + .5at^2
some trig equations too i guess

The Attempt at a Solution



I figured that the rocket experiences free fall and should have the vertical component of -gt. Then I thought that the horizontal component should be the equivalent of the plane so it would be 860 km/h or 3060 m/s. Since its moving relative to the plane I kind of just assumed its horizontal velocity is 0 relative to the plane.

Afterward, I derived the horizontal acceleration of the rocket which would be 25.46 meters squared and figured out how long it would take for it to reach 1000 m which was 8.86 seconds. I then figured that if one of its horizontal position is 1000 I can use trig to figure out its vertical, which using tan30 = x/1000 i got 577.35 meters.

I then punched it in x= vt + .5at^2 which looked like 577.35 = -gt(8.86) + .5(29.4*sin30)(8.86^2), either way I got like -0.00435 seconds which is ridiculous. Help :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm no expert, but if you have found out how many metres the rocket needs to fall before it can start its thrust, and the question is asking for how long in seconds the rocket needs to freefall, the calculation is fairly simple, using g.
 
Agreed, and I've tried that. Unfortunately, the computed value doesn't work.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Back
Top