Kinematics Problem -- 3 particles at the vertices of an equilateral triangle

AI Thread Summary
Three particles A, B, and C are positioned at the vertices of an equilateral triangle and move with constant speed towards each other along the sides. Despite being restricted to their respective sides, they will meet at the center of the triangle due to their continuous adjustment in direction towards one another. The motion is not fixed to the original triangle's vertices but dynamically changes as they approach each other. This understanding clarifies the apparent contradiction of how they can meet while remaining on the sides. The particles will converge at a single point over time.
RandomGuy1
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Here's the question:

Three particles A, B and C are situated at the vertices of an equilateral triangle ABC of side d at time t = 0. Each of the particles moves with constant speed v. The particle at A always has its velocity along AB, B along BC and C along CA. At what time will the particles meet?

And here's what I don't understand - If each particle is restricted to its corresponding side of the triangle, how exactly will they "meet"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sides of the triangle are getting smaller.
 
  • Like
Likes RandomGuy1
RandomGuy1 said:
The particle at A always has its velocity along AB, B along BC and C along CA.
It's a bit oddly worded. Don't think in terms of fixed directions based on the original positions. As the particles move and change position: A always moves toward B, B always moves toward C, C always moves toward A.
 
  • Like
Likes RandomGuy1
Doc Al said:
It's a bit oddly worded. Don't think in terms of fixed directions based on the original positions. As the particles move and change position: A always moves toward B, B always moves toward C, C always moves toward A.

You were right. That cleared a lot up. Thanks!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top