Kinematics Question -- Two motorbikes accelerating at each other....

AI Thread Summary
Two motorbikes, initially 80 meters apart, accelerate towards each other at rates of 4.6 m/s² and 2.4 m/s². The goal is to determine the time it takes for them to reach a separation of 24 meters. The equations of motion for both motorbikes were established, leading to a final equation that was solved to find the time. The correct answer for the time elapsed until they are 24 meters apart is 4 seconds. Proper setup of the coordinate system and careful algebra were emphasized as crucial for solving similar kinematics problems.
michaelgtozer
Messages
8
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Two stationary motorbikes at time 0s are separated by distance of 80m. Both motorbikes accelerate at a constant rate as the travel towards each other. Motorbike X accelerates at a rate of 4.6m/s2 . Motorbike Y accelerates at a rate of 2.4m/s2 . Calculate the amount of time that elapses until the two motorbikes reach a distance of separation of 24m. Recall that, for an initial velocity of 0, d = 0.5at2

Homework Equations


d = 0.5at^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I know the answer to this problem is 3.5s. I am just wondering how to find a general solution for this problem, meaning a equation or a combination of equations that when the equation is solved for "t", i am able to plug in different values and get the correct answer each time.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi mike:

Your description of your solution attempt is hard to read. In particular:
michaelgtozer said:
I figured this out by adding 4.6 and 2.4, which says that since they are doing constant acceleration that every second they are traveling 7 meters toward each other each second, and 7 meters multiplied by 8 would give me the 56m total that they need to travel towards each other.
I suggest you express your thoughts in equations. What is the rate the two motorbikes are accelerating towards each other? How much time will it take for the bikes ti change their distance from 80 m to 24 m? Can you use the equation in (2) to represent this?

Regards,
Buzz
 
That seems to be where I am having the trouble. I can't see how I can use the equation from part two get to the answer of 3.5s. When i look at the equation I see that it only allows me to put in 1 acceleration when the problem is giving me two to work with.
 
michaelgtozer said:
That seems to be where I am having the trouble. I can't see how I can use the equation from part two get to the answer of 3.5s. When i look at the equation I see that it only allows me to put in 1 acceleration when the problem is giving me two to work with.
Start by defining an axis, in this case you can call it the "x-axis" with the left motorbike at the origin x=0 and the right motorbike at x=_____

Then use the full equation for the motion:

x(t) = x_0 + v_{0x}t + \frac{1}{2}a_x t^2

Write that equation for each motorbike (calling them different "x" values like "x_left(t)" and "x_right(t)", and start to solve for things... :smile:
 
berkeman said:
Start by defining an axis, in this case you can call it the "x-axis" with the left motorbike at the origin x=0 and the right motorbike at x=_____

Then use the full equation for the motion:

x(t) = x_0 + v_{0x}t + \frac{1}{2}a_x t^2

Write that equation for each motorbike (calling them different "x" values like "x_left(t)" and "x_right(t)", and start to solve for things... :smile:

So far I have this:

I started with both bikes on the x axis:
bike x starts at 0m
bike y starts at 80m

equation for bike R is R: = 1/2at^
equation for bike L is: L = 80 - 1/2at^2

so i know both accelerations, and I am trying to solve for time, but i still have 2 unknown values of x and y...
So since there are 3 unknowns it means i would need 3 equations, but i don't have a third one
 
Last edited:
michaelgtozer said:
equation for bike y is: y = 80 + 1/2at^2
The right-hand motorbike accelerates to the left, which is a negative acceleration on the x-axis.

BTW, maybe call the 2 motorbikes L and R to avoid confusion with any x-axis (and any y-axis, which does not enter into this problem).
 
berkeman said:
The right-hand motorbike accelerates to the left, which is a negative acceleration on the x-axis.

BTW, maybe call the 2 motorbikes L and R to avoid confusion with any x-axis (and any y-axis, which does not enter into this problem).

Okay so i changed the variables to R and L, also changed the sign of the acceleration in the L equation to a negative.
Any hints on what I should do next? Still very confused.
 
Can you show the two equations as you have them now for the motion of the two motorbikes?
michaelgtozer said:
Calculate the amount of time that elapses until the two motorbikes reach a distance of separation of 24m.
And what is the equation that you can write for the condition mentioned above? You would use those 3 equations to solve for the time... :smile:
 
berkeman said:
Can you show the two equations as you have them now for the motion of the two motorbikes?

And what is the equation that you can write for the condition mentioned above? You would use those 3 equations to solve for the time... :smile:

So the two equations I have now are:
R = 1/2at^2
L = 80 - 1/2at^2

so for the third equation i think it would look something like this..
R = 80 - (24+L), so it would simplify to R = 56 - L i think..

From this would i solve R for t^2, then put in the t^2 in the L equation, then solve the 3rd equation for L, and sub it in the same L equation, then solve the entire equation for R, then put that R value in and solve for t^2?
 
  • #10
michaelgtozer said:
So the two equations I have now are:
R = 1/2at^2
L = 80 - 1/2at^2

so for the third equation i think it would look something like this..
R = 80 - (24+L), so it would simplify to R = 56 - L i think..

From this would i solve R for t^2, then put in the t^2 in the L equation, then solve the 3rd equation for L, and sub it in the same L equation, then solve the entire equation for R, then put that R value in and solve for t^2?
That was a little confusing for me, so let me try to say it a bit differently.

L = left motorbike, starting at x_L(0s)=0m
R = right motorbike, starting at x_R(0s)=80m
michaelgtozer said:
Motorbike X accelerates at a rate of 4.6m/s2 . Motorbike Y accelerates at a rate of 2.4m/s2
So equation for the L motorbike is x_L(t) = 0 + 0 + 1/2 (4.6m/s^2)t^2
And for the R motorbike is x_R(t) = 80m + 0 - __________
And the problem asks for the time t when x_R(t) - x_L(t) = 24m

Can you use that notation and fill in the rest of the equation for x_R(t) and continue with the solution...? :smile:
 
  • #11
berkeman said:
That was a little confusing for me, so let me try to say it a bit differently.

L = left motorbike, starting at x_L(0s)=0m
R = right motorbike, starting at x_R(0s)=80m

So equation for the L motorbike is x_L(t) = 0 + 0 + 1/2 (4.6m/s^2)t^2
And for the R motorbike is x_R(t) = 80m + 0 - __________
And the problem asks for the time t when x_R(t) - x_L(t) = 24m

Can you use that notation and fill in the rest of the equation for x_R(t) and continue with the solution...? :smile:

Okay so the equation for the motion of R motorbike is R(t) = 80m + 0 - 1/2(2.4m/s^2)t^2

Now that I have all 3 equations but i do this:
x_L(t) = 0 + 0 + 1/2 (4.6m/s^2)t^2 ----> is equal to t^2 = x_L(t)/2.3

So when I combine that equation and x_R(t) - x_L(t) = 24m the final equation should be:

24 - x_L(t) = 80 - 1/2x_L(t)*(1/2.3)

and i would solve the equation for x_L(t) it looks like:
x_L(t) = -56/(-1/4.6 + 1) which i don't think is correct. The final answer to this problem should be t = 4 seconds, but i just can't seem to get that answer
 
  • #12
michaelgtozer said:
So when I combine that equation and x_R(t) - x_L(t) = 24m the final equation should be:

24 - x_L(t) = 80 - 1/2x_L(t)*(1/2.3)
I'm also not quite tracking that...

To summarize:
x_L(t) = 0 + 0 + 1/2 (4.6m/s^2)t^2
x_R(t) = 80m + 0 - 1/2(2.4m/s^2)t^2
x_R(t) - x_L(t) = 24m
michaelgtozer said:
The final answer to this problem should be t = 4 seconds, but i just can't seem to get that answer
When I plug the first 2 equations into the 3rd equation, I get an answer which is within a percent or so of 4 seconds...What do you get? (please show each step on a separate line...) :smile:
 
  • #13
berkeman said:
I'm also not quite tracking that...

To summarize:
x_L(t) = 0 + 0 + 1/2 (4.6m/s^2)t^2
x_R(t) = 80m + 0 - 1/2(2.4m/s^2)t^2
x_R(t) - x_L(t) = 24m

When I plug the first 2 equations into the 3rd equation, I get an answer which is within a percent or so of 4 seconds...What do you get? (please show each step on a separate line...) :smile:

So when i put the first 2 equations in the 3rd i get
80 - 1.2t^2 - 2.3t^2 = 24
-3.5t^2 = -56
t^2 = -56/-3.5
t= sqrt(56/3.5)
t = 4
 
  • #14
michaelgtozer said:
So when i put the first 2 equations in the 3rd i get
80 - 1.2t^2 - 2.3t^2 = 24
-3.5t^2 = -56
t^2 = -56/-3.5
t= sqrt(56/3.5)
t = 4
Yep, that's what I got. :smile:

So to recap, for these kinds of problems, set up a coordinate system, write out the full form of the Kinematic Equations that you may need to use, be careful with your algebra, and think about what is going on physically to keep the equations real. Oh, and it's a good idea to carry units along in your equations to be sure you haven't dropped a term along the way.

Good! :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes michaelgtozer
  • #15
berkeman said:
Yep, that's what I got. :smile:

So to recap, for these kinds of problems, set up a coordinate system, write out the full form of the Kinematic Equations that you may need to use, be careful with your algebra, and think about what is going on physically to keep the equations real. Oh, and it's a good idea to carry units along in your equations to be sure you haven't dropped a term along the way.

Good! :smile:
Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Back
Top