Kinetic Energies of Particles in Nuclear Decay

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a homework problem regarding the kinetic energies of particles resulting from the alpha decay of a stationary uranium-238 nucleus. The main question is to determine the ratio of the kinetic energy of the daughter nucleus to that of the alpha particle. Participants suggest using conservation of energy principles and the kinetic energy formula (1/2 mv^2) to approach the problem. A proposed method involves calculating the rest masses of the uranium-238 nucleus, the daughter nucleus, and the alpha particle to find the energy converted to kinetic energy. Clarification is sought on whether the focus should be on kinetic energy ratios or other aspects of the decay process.
lifeiseasy
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A stationary uranium-238 nucleus undergoes alpha-decay. What is the ratio of the daughter nucleus to that of the alpha-particle?

P.S. It's a practice problem for which I had the final answer, but I'm not sure how to reach it.

Homework Equations


I guess it's based on conservation of energy. I'm unsure of the equations, though.
1/2 mv^2 for K.E.

The Attempt at a Solution


Sorry, I just don't know how to start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the question isn't really clear. Are you trying to find the ratio of kinetic energy of the daughter nucleus to the alpha particle? I am not exactly sure if this is right or what level you are studying at but my approach would be
firstly work out the rest mass of the U238, next you find the daughter nucleus and work out its rest mass, followed by rest mass of the alpha particle, the difference should be what has been converted to KE
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Why Is Energy Released in Nuclear Decay Equal to Change in Binding Energies?
Replies
13
Views
1K
Nuclear Physics help please (alpha decay of a Po-216 atom)
Replies
1
Views
3K
Electrons and their little role in nuclear physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
Kinetic Energy for particles (alpha decay)
Replies
2
Views
3K
How to calculate gamma ray energies following beta decay?
Replies
12
Views
1K
Using energy considerations to analyse particle motion
Replies
3
Views
834
Rate of emission of alpha particle in uranium decay
Replies
2
Views
2K
Conservation of momentum and nuclear decay (Gr 12 Physics)
Replies
1
Views
1K
What is the energy of the alpha particle and recoiling nucleus?
Replies
9
Views
6K
Kinetic energy of an alpha particle
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top