Kinetic Energy/Circular Motion and figuring out point charges

AI Thread Summary
An electrically neutral model airplane flying in a horizontal circle breaks its guideline at 50J of kinetic energy, while the addition of point charges (+q and -q) increases the break point to 51.8J. The challenge lies in calculating the magnitude of the charges based on the change in kinetic energy and the forces involved. Initial calculations suggested a force of 1.2 N, but further analysis revealed the correct force to be approximately 7x10^4 N. The solution indicates that the charge magnitude is 3.5x10^-5 C, with the error stemming from an incorrect division during the calculations. Understanding the relationship between force and kinetic energy is crucial for solving similar problems.
succubus
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
For the life of me I can't seem to get this problem.

An electrically neutral model airplane is flying in a horizontal circle in a 3m guideline, which is nearly parallel to the floor. The line breaks when the Kinetic energy is 50J. Now, reconsider the same situation, except now there is a point charge of +q and -q on either ends of the guideline. The line now breaks when the KE is 51.8 J. Find the magnitude of the charges.

I tried relating v2 = Fr/m, and equating that to v2=2(KE)/m so Fr/m = 2(deltaKE)/m and got a force of 1.2 N. I figure I have to find the force before I can find the point charge, but I can't seem to find the force. When I worked backward from the solution, the force turned out to be around 7x10(4) N. Which makes more sense. What am I doing wrong?

Thanks for any help

 
Physics news on Phys.org
I completely agree with your derivation of the force change being 1.2N. What is the 'solution'?
 
The answer is 3.5x10(-5) C
 
I get that this charge corresponds to a force of about 1.2N at a distance of 3m. I think the problem is in the "working backwards" part.
 
I figured it out. I was dividing by two for some reason, and then realized I had to square root the answer. Thanks for your help :)
 
I actually am working on this exact problem and can't figure out what to do. Is there a possibility you could type out the steps of approaching this problem?? That would be great!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top