Kinetic energy of 3 rolling objects

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the kinetic energy of three rolling objects: a solid cylinder, a solid sphere, and a hoop, all with equal radii and mass, as they roll down an incline. The participant concludes that the total kinetic energy (KE) at the bottom is the same for all objects, leading to the answer "None of the above" for Part 1. In Part 2, they assert that differing radii do not affect the KE outcome, but differing masses would. The participant seeks validation for their reasoning, emphasizing energy conservation principles. The analysis highlights the importance of mass and height in determining kinetic energy, while the shape of the objects does not influence the total energy at the bottom of the incline.
twerkit
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Part 1:

Three objects, a solid cylinder, solid sphere, and a hoop all have equal radii and mass. They all roll down the same incline. Which of the following statements is true about the kinetic energy K
of the of the objects after they have rolled down the incline and reached the bottom?

A) K-hoop > K-cylinder
B) K-hoop > K-sphere
C) K-cylinder > K-hoop
D) K-sphere > K-cylinder
E) None of the above answers are correct

Part 2:

If the radii of the three objects differed, would the above answer still hold true? What about if the masses differed?

Homework Equations



None directly provided for this problem.

The Attempt at a Solution



**the "i's" stand for initial and "f's" stand for final**

Since the system is isolated and there is no friction energy is conserved, so

PE + KE = C (constant)

Taking derivative:

ΔPE + ΔKE = 0

PEf - PEi = 0 - mgh

ΔPE = -mgh

KEf - KEi = mgh - 0

ΔKE = mgh

Since the final potential energy is 0, the final KE = mgh. The only parameters for the energy in this situation are the objects' masses and the height of the ramp, so I believe the answer to Part 1 is:
E) None are correct

And for part 2, since the only parameters for the KE are mass and height, a difference in the radii will not change the answer to Part 1, but a difference in the masses will.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There is no answer key for this problem, so I am checking to see if my answer is correct. If not please let me know what I did wrong. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds good to me.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top