Kinetic energy of a ball when falling (projectile motion)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the kinetic energy (Ek) of a ball falling from a table. The ball, with a mass of 0.5 kg, rolls off a table at 4 m/s and falls 4 meters. The potential energy (Ep) at the height is calculated as 19.6 J, while the kinetic energy just before impact is found to be 23.6 J, indicating a misunderstanding of the energy conversion during the fall. The conversation clarifies that the kinetic energy increases as the ball falls, with the total energy being the sum of initial kinetic energy and potential energy converted to kinetic energy. The participants conclude that the vertical speed of the ball at impact is conventionally considered as a positive value, despite the complexities involved in the collision dynamics.
paperdoll
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A ball of mass 0.5 kg rolls off a table 4 metres above the ground with a speed of 4 ms^-1.

a) what is the kinetic energy of the ball when it strikes the ground.
b) what is the kinetic energy of the ball just before it strikes the ground
c) what is the speed of the ball as it strikes the ground


Homework Equations



Ek=1/2mv^2
V^2=u^2+2as
Ep=mgh

The Attempt at a Solution


okay so to get a) I did Ep=mgh so when the ball strikes the ground, all Ep should be turned into Ek right?

So 0.5*9.8*4=19.6 J

for b) I know the horizontal final velocity component is 4 ms^-1. The vertical final velocity should be found using v^2=u^2+2as.

v^2=2*-9.8*-4
v=8.85 ms^-1

using pythagoras throem I got the final v to be 9.7159 ms^-1.

Ek=9.715^2*0.5*0.5=23.6 J

What I'm not sure about is for answer b) I got 23.6 and for a) I got 19.6. Shouldn't a) be a larger value than b) because with a), the ball has striked the ground. I don't know where I have gone wrong :confused:

please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your calculations are good, but I don't think you realize what you've calculated.

Your answer of 19.6J is the change in kinetic energy from when the ball was rolling along the table to when it was just about to hit the floor. And your answer of 23.6J is the KE of the ball just before it hit the floor.

So I think you have calculated b) correctly. To work out the answer to question a), you're going to need to make some kind of assumption about the motion of the ball exactly when it is touching the ground.
 
BruceW said:
Your calculations are good, but I don't think you realize what you've calculated.

Your answer of 19.6J is the change in kinetic energy from when the ball was rolling along the table to when it was just about to hit the floor. And your answer of 23.6J is the KE of the ball just before it hit the floor.

So I think you have calculated b) correctly. To work out the answer to question a), you're going to need to make some kind of assumption about the motion of the ball exactly when it is touching the ground.

Would the assumption be that v=0 when the ball hits the ground? So in that case, Ek is zero then? :confused:

I thought that when the ball hit the floor, all the Ep would be converted into Ek? A bit confused but I understand what you say about the assumption I think.
 
Just before the ball hits the floor, all the Ep will have been converted into Ek. And the ball on the table had 4J of Ek. And you calculated the change in KE is 19.6J. So adding these together, you get 23.6J (this is a good way to check your answer of part b).

The assumption v=0 when the ball hits the ground is one possible assumption. And this might be a good assumption if the ground was a very viscous fluid. But as you've said, Ek would be zero, and so question a) would have a suspiciously easy answer.

I think the assumption they want you to use is less strict. (And its a very common assumption in these types of questions). Think about the vertical speed of the ball before and after collision.
 
BruceW said:
Just before the ball hits the floor, all the Ep will have been converted into Ek. And the ball on the table had 4J of Ek. And you calculated the change in KE is 19.6J. So adding these together, you get 23.6J (this is a good way to check your answer of part b).

The assumption v=0 when the ball hits the ground is one possible assumption. And this might be a good assumption if the ground was a very viscous fluid. But as you've said, Ek would be zero, and so question a) would have a suspiciously easy answer.

I think the assumption they want you to use is less strict. (And its a very common assumption in these types of questions). Think about the vertical speed of the ball before and after collision.

I've been trying to think but I'm still not sure about the assumption. Would it have something to do with the conservation of momentum?
 
I guess you could use conservation of momentum to explain what happens to the horizontal speed. (Also making use of the fact that the force from the ground is purely vertical, assuming no friction).

For vertical speed, while the ball is touching the ground, we can say the ball squashes, and undergoes an extreme upwards acceleration. So really, while the ball is touching the ground, different parts of the ball will have different values for the vertical speed, and will go through a range of different values.

So the vertical speed while the ball is striking the ground is actually a vague concept, which could have several possible answers. So I suppose that the 'vertical speed as the ball strikes the ground' is chosen more as convention, rather than by assumption.

The vertical speed of the ball is negative before collision and positive after collision. So, you can probably guess what is the conventional vertical speed of the ball as it strikes the ground. (its a simple answer, no working required).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top