Kinetic energy of a recoiled electron when backscattered

AI Thread Summary
For very high energy photons, the kinetic energy (KE) of a recoiling electron during backscattering at an angle of 180 degrees can be expressed as KE = Ephoton - 255.5 KeV. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying the principles of energy conservation and the relationships between energy, wavelength, and the electron's rest mass energy. A misunderstanding arises regarding the interpretation of E and E', leading to confusion in deriving the correct formula. Clarification is provided that E' represents the energy after the collision, while E is the energy before the collision, emphasizing the need for accurate algebraic manipulation. Ultimately, the goal is to demonstrate that the kinetic energy approaches the stated formula under the specified conditions.
StephenD420
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
Show that for very high energy photons, the kinetic energy of the recoiling electron approaches
KE= Ephoton - 255.5 KeV for back-scattering, phi = 180 degrees.

I know that

λ'/hc = λ/hc + (1-cos phi)/m0c^2
and since E = hc/λ
E' = E + m0c^2/(1-cos phi)
when phi is 180 degrees
E' = E + m0c^2/2
and the resting energy of the electron is m0c^2 = .511 MeV
so
E' = E + 255.5KeV
so E = Ephoton - 255.5Kev

Is this right?? I am not sure about the last step where Ephoton = E'?

Thanks.
Stephen
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
StephenD420 said:
Show that for very high energy photons, the kinetic energy of the recoiling electron approaches
KE= Ephoton - 255.5 KeV for back-scattering, phi = 180 degrees.

I know that

λ'/hc = λ/hc + (1-cos phi)/m0c^2
and since E = hc/λ
E' = E + m0c^2/(1-cos phi)
when phi is 180 degrees
E' = E + m0c^2/2
and the resting energy of the electron is m0c^2 = .511 MeV
so
E' = E + 255.5KeV
so E = Ephoton - 255.5Kev

Is this right?? I am not sure about the last step where Ephoton = E'?

Thanks.
Stephen
No, it's not correct because 1/a = 1/b + 1/c doesn't imply a = b + c, which is what you did when you went from wavelength to energy.
 
ok so...what do I do?
 
Ok
1/E'=1/E +(1-cos phi)/.511Mev
now if you inverse both sides what do you get then
 
ok so I put this into Mathematica and got
In[2]:= simplify ((1/a)^-1 == (1/b)^-1 + (1/c)^-1)



Out[2]= simplify (a == b + c)

so
E' = E/(1+(E/m0c^2)*(1- cos phi))

Which is my answer when phi = 180 degrees and m0c^2 = .511MeV

so what do you think?
 
You seem to think E' is the kinetic energy of the electron. It isn't.
 
ok so can you give me a hint then...
 
StephenD420 said:
ok so I put this into Mathematica and got
In[2]:= simplify ((1/a)^-1 == (1/b)^-1 + (1/c)^-1)



Out[2]= simplify (a == b + c)
If you have ##\frac{1}{a} = \frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c}##, it follows that ##a = \left[\frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c}\right]^{-1}##. You had already repeated the mistake I pointed out when you entered the above into Mathematica.

First thing you want to do is get things straight in your head. What does E represent? What does E' represent? What quantity are you trying to solve for? How can that be expressed in terms of E, E', and other variables in the problem?
 
I am just trying to show that with high energy photon the recoiling KE approaches KE = Ephoton - 255.5 KeV

E' is Ephoton
and E is E photon before collision

now since I get the right answer...I do not know how else to get the right answer...any help would be appreciated and (Δλ/hc)^(-1) = hc/Δλ = ΔE = E' - E = (1/m0c^2 *(1-cos phi))^(-1) = m0c^2/(1-cos phi).

and if phi = 180 degrees and m0c^2 = .511 Mev
ΔE = .511MeV/2 = .2555 KeV
so I really do not know what you are getting at...
 
  • #10
What I'm getting at is that you're not doing the basic algebra correctly. You have
$$\frac{hc}{\Delta \lambda} = \frac{hc}{\lambda' - \lambda}$$ and
$$ E'-E = \frac{hc}{\lambda'} - \frac{hc}{\lambda}.$$ You're claiming those two are equal because
$$\frac{hc}{\lambda' - \lambda} = \frac{hc}{\lambda'} - \frac{hc}{\lambda}.$$ Note this is akin to saying ##\frac{1}{3-1}## is equal to ##\frac{1}{3}-\frac{1}{1}##. It's obviously not correct.
 
  • #11
and I am saying ok since I getting the same numbers the professor wants, then if that is not right please point me in the right direction as I do not see how the professor got the numbers otherwise if not the rest energy of the electron over (1-cos phi) = 2
 
Back
Top