Kinetic Energy vs Burger Energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between kinetic energy and the energy derived from food, specifically analyzing how the kilojoules from a Quarter Pounder can translate into running speed. The initial calculation incorrectly estimated the speed at approximately 7 m/s, while the correct calculation reveals a speed of approximately 224 m/s when accounting for the energy content of 2000 kilojoules. Key misconceptions include the assumption of 100% efficiency in energy conversion and the neglect of energy losses during physical activity. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding energy transfer and efficiency in physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as kinetic energy and momentum
  • Familiarity with energy units, specifically kilojoules
  • Knowledge of human physiology related to energy expenditure during physical activity
  • Basic mathematical skills for solving equations involving energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of energy conversion efficiency in human physiology
  • Learn about the physics of motion and acceleration in running
  • Explore the concept of energy loss during physical activities
  • Investigate the relationship between nutrition and physical performance
USEFUL FOR

Physics educators, students studying mechanics, fitness enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the science of energy conversion in physical activities.

oneiron
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello Everyone.

I was teaching a physics class the other day on basic momentum and kinetic energy when I decided, for fun, to work out how fast the kilojoules from a Quarter Pounder could propel you. A Quarter Pounder (according to the box) gives you roughly 2000 kilojoules, and my mass is about 80kg. so...

E = 1/2 m v^2
2000kj=.5*80*v^2
sqrt(50) = v = 7ish ms^1 = 25ishkph

Which is fast, but is not THAT fast. Certainly well slower than the records.

So I tried to look at things another way.

If the average person can run 100m in about 20seconds then they're running at 5ms^1.
So, 1/2 mv^2 = .5*80*25=1000kj.

When one is running, chemical energy is being turned into kinetic energy to propell me up to that speed. When I slow down, I can't see how the kinetic energy could be transferred into chemical potential energy in my body...

so this math would say that to burn off a burger, I only need to do two short sprints, reaching 5ms^-1. This seems far far far too easy in my mind.

Where is the mistake in my thinking?

Cheers,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You messed units (kiloJoules), missing factor 1000.
And, of course, the nutrition energy may be converted to mechanical one in your muscles with pretty limited efficiency.
 
Welcome to Physics Forums, oneiron.

You have made several simplifications here and a number of errors. Firstly, your initial calculation is off by some way. It should be

2\times10^6 = \frac{1}{2}80v^2 \Rightarrow v \approx 224 \text{m}.\text{s}^{-1}

Secondly, you assume that the body has unit efficiency, i.e. it absorbs everything it takes in. Obviously this isn't true. Thirdly, you assume that the runner runs at constant speed for the entire distance, which isn't true - there will be a period of acceleration followed by a short period of constant speed, followed by another period of acceleration. Fourthly, you assume again, the the body is 100% efficient, in that any energy it uses is converted entirely to speed, which isn't the case - what about the wasted energy breathing, thinking, blinking, repairing damage, heartbeat etc.

Regarding your final point:
When one is running, chemical energy is being turned into kinetic energy to propell me up to that speed. When I slow down, I can't see how the kinetic energy could be transferred into chemical potential energy in my body...
This is very worrying if you are indeed teaching a physics class and had to ask this question. In actuality, this entire thread is worrying if you are teaching physics. After the sprint, your body does not "reabsorb" the energy you expelled during the race. In fact, your body uses energy in slowing you down. The energy you expelled during the race (and slowing down afterward) is "lost" to the environment so to speak.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K