Kinetic friction or static friction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between kinetic friction and the forces acting on a moving box. When a force F is applied, and kinetic friction is 0.4F, the box accelerates with a net force of 0.6F. If the applied force suddenly decreases to 0.3F, kinetic friction remains in effect, causing the box to slow down, which is a normal response. Participants clarify that friction is generally proportional to the normal force, not the pulling force, and emphasize that a decrease in driving force below friction will naturally result in deceleration. The mechanics of friction and motion are consistent with basic physics principles.
VHAHAHA
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Can anyone explain this case ?
If a moving box is pulling with a force F and the kinetic friction is 0.4F, of course, it will move in the direction of applied force with an acceleration and the net force is 0.6F
But what if the force suddenly decreases to 0.3F ?
The box is still moving so the friction is still kinetic friction?? But if it is the case, then the box will slow down! This seems quite strange to me@@
Can anyone explain please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. " the kinetic friction is 0.4F, of course,"
Of course??
Doesn't seem like an ofcoursity to me!
Why should the frictional force be proportional to the pulling force?
It might be, obviously, but generally, friction is proportional to the NORMAL force between the surface and te box.

2. "But if it is the case, then the box will slow down!"
So what?
Kinetic friction occurs whenever there is a strict velocity difference between the surface and the box.
 
Do you really find that surprising? If the driving force drops below the friction force, naturally the object will slowdown. If you suddenly ease on the accelerator, do you find it surprising that your car coasts down to a stop?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top