Kinetic Theory Of Gases - radiometer

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the net force on a blade of a Crooke's radiometer given different temperatures for black and white surfaces. The correct formula for this calculation is F = nk(T_b - T_w)A, where n is the gas density, k is Boltzmann's constant, T_b is the temperature of the black surface, T_w is the temperature of the white surface, and A is the area. Substituting the provided values results in a force of 2.5 x 10^-16 N. In the limit of vanishing gas density, the net force approaches zero, as there would be no molecules to create a temperature difference. This highlights the dependence of the radiometer's operation on the presence of gas molecules.
InnealtóirLeTeacht
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
This is a question relating to a Crooke's radiometer:

Assume that due to absorption, the local temperature close to the black surface is T = 50C, while the temperature close to the white surface is T = 20C. For a gas with density n = 2:5 x 10E20m-3, compute the net force on one blade of area 1cm2. What do you expect in the limit of vanishing gas density?

I would appreciate any help you can give, if anyone knows what the 'limit of vanishing gas density' is or has any equations that would be useful in solving the problem.

I'm sure this is incorrect but can you use the formula for Kinetic Energy- KE=3/2 kT and subtract the kinetic energy by the white surface from that of the black surface?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No, this is not the correct approach. The net force on one blade of the Crooke's radiometer can be calculated using the following equation: F = nk(T_b - T_w)A, where n is the number density of the gas, k is Boltzmann's constant, T_b is the temperature of the black surface, T_w is the temperature of the white surface, and A is the area of the blade. Substituting the given values yields a force of 2.5 x 10^-16 N. In the limit of vanishing gas density, the force would approach zero. This is because in the absence of molecules to absorb the thermal radiation, there is no temperature difference between the black and white surfaces, thus no net force would be generated.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top