Kinetics Homework Help: N2O5 Decomposition @ 70°C

  • Thread starter Thread starter youxcrushxme
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homework Kinetics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the remaining amount of N2O5 after 2.5 minutes given its first-order rate constant of 6.82x10-3 s-1. The initial concentration is 25 mmol in a 2L volume. Participants suggest using the first-order kinetics formula, which involves the rate constant and time to determine the concentration at a specific time. The problem emphasizes understanding the application of kinetics in chemical reactions. Clear guidance on the formula and calculations is sought to solve the problem effectively.
youxcrushxme
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone

I need some help with this problem -

The first order rate constant for the decomposition of N2O5 at 70 degrees celsius is 6.82x10-3 s-1

2N2O5 -> 4NO2 +O2

Suppose we start with 25 mmol of N2O5 in a volume of 2L. How many mmol of N2O5 will remain after 2.5 min?

I'm not sure about what formula I should be using for this. Any help would be appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://www2.wwnorton.com/college/chemistry/gilbert/concepts/chapter14/ch14_3.htm#2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Decomposition of N2O5: Reaction Mechanisms and Intermediate Concentrations
Replies
1
Views
4K
Chemical Kinetics QuestionDetermination of order of reaction
Replies
1
Views
3K
How do I solve these Chemical Kinetics homework problems?
Replies
9
Views
6K
[Kinetics] Using Rate as a Conversion Factor
Replies
4
Views
2K
Kinetics question: calculating rate constants
Replies
11
Views
3K
Calculating O2 Volume from First-Order Decomposition of Hydrogen Peroxide
Replies
8
Views
4K
ENTHALPY ? Concept Undestanding help
Replies
3
Views
4K
What is the Reaction Order and Rate Constant for 2C4H6 --> C8H12 at 320°C?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Reaction order/constant, time dependent pressure
Replies
2
Views
9K
Internal combustion engine calculation questions
Replies
9
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top