Kirchhoff's Law Help: Solve Voltage & Current for Circuit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around applying Kirchhoff's laws to solve for voltage and current in a circuit. The user calculated the total resistance as 4.5Ω but was confused about the role of the 18V supply in determining current flow. It was clarified that while the absolute voltage is not crucial for relative current calculations, it is essential for determining potential at different points in the circuit. After calculating the current flow as 4/3 A and the voltage drop across the first resistor as 4V, the user deduced that 14V remains for the parallel section. The final calculations involve determining the current in each branch of the parallel section, confirming the user's understanding of the circuit analysis.
womatama
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://imgur.com/DuBgK


Homework Equations


I1=I2+I3

Sum of the directed potential differences around any closed loop equals zero

The Attempt at a Solution


I worked out the total resistance which came out to be 4.5Ω [3 + 1/(1/6+1/2)]
But now I don't know which voltage to use to calculate the total current flow in the circuit. The confusion I have is the +18V, I don't understand where it comes from hence I am confused as to what amount of potential to use.. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that potential is, in some sense, arbitrary. The loop rule says that if you start at some point, and traverse one whole loop and come back to your starting point, the total change to your potential is zero. So taking any loop starting at 18 V and coming back to that point will leave you with a potential of 18 V, so the 18 V doesn't actually matter for figuring out the relative currents. What it is useful for is working out the absolute numbers; e.g., once you figure out the current i across the top left resistor, you can subtract iR from 18 V to get the potential at point A.
 
Oh thanks for the advice there :D
So I worked out the current flow to be 4/3 A (Vsupply/Rtotal) and found that the voltage drop across the first resistor to be 4V so 18-4 = 14V right? :P
Here is how I'm finishing it:
Since the supply has lost 4V it is left with 2V across the parallel section. Since the voltage across parallel is constant, I worked out the current for each of the branches to be 1/3 A and 1 A so now I can just subtract iR from the remaining electrical potential to find the solution to the rest of the points. Hope I am doing this right, thank you for your help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top