Kites, and really long strings

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter SteveDB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Strings
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the physics of kite flying, specifically focusing on the calculations related to altitude and horizontal distance achieved by a kite flown with a long string. Participants explore various factors influencing the kite's flight, including mass, wind conditions, and string properties, while reflecting on personal experiences with kites from the past.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant recalls a childhood experience of flying a kite with a long string and seeks to determine the altitude and horizontal distance using various physical parameters.
  • Another participant suggests approximating the kite's flight path using a catenary equation and proposes using a line integral to relate string length to height.
  • A different participant emphasizes the importance of wind forces acting on the string and suggests using lighter materials for better performance in future experiments.
  • One participant questions the feasibility of accurately recalling specific details such as wind velocities and trajectory from an event that occurred 40 years ago.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of recalling precise details from the past and the methods to mathematically model the kite's flight. No consensus is reached regarding the best approach to solve the problem.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the physical properties of the kite and string, as well as the influence of environmental conditions like wind and atmospheric density, which remain unresolved.

SteveDB
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi all.
It's been quite a while since I've been here, but I was reminded this morning about my childhood when a friend of mine and I got a hold of a spool of string that was purported to have been 5 miles in length. Thinking about it I think it was probably more like some 5000 feet in length.
Since that was almost 40 years ago, I can't really say that I remember exactly what was going on.
What we did was to attach our paper kite to it-- the kind that existed in the late 1960's-- and let it fly.
I remember it taking some 3 or 4 hours to let it all the way out, and another 5 or 6 to reel it back in. We started out at sunrise, and didn't get done until sunset.
My point for this whole "exercise" is to determine if I can obtain the altitude, and horizontal distance it was from our location.
The primary components that I've been able to identify/remember at this point are:
Kite mass
String mass/unit length
Wind velocities- speed, trajectory/vectors
Initial height would've been 3 feet on my end
Atmospherric density differential due to altitude changes
Length of string/thread.
Area of kite body/face exposed to winds
As stated, this was a simple paper kite kids flew back in the 1960's. For those among you who are younger, go ask your fathers/mothers.
They were made of thin, dyed/colored paper, and light sticks (the kind Charlie Brown flies in the comic strip). Something akin to a pop-sickle stick, but longer, and shaped almost like a dowel. We then connected the top end to a string, and a few inches up from the lower end, to another string. These were then connected at the center of mass to the flight string. This allowed for balanced flight dynamics.
I detail it like this because the kites in existence today are far more advanced, and fancy than we had back then.
I've gone to Wikipedia, and found the discussion they've provided on catenaries. FRom what I remember, a catenary is the natural shape a suspended string takes when attached at both ends.
And the arc length would be (if I remember it correctly): S= Int(Int(sqrt(dx^2/dy^2 + 1)), 0, N, x), 0, M, y) where M, and N are the maximum distances the string could go.
They have a function for y as follows:
y= a* cosh (x/a) = a/2 * (exp(x/a) + exp(-x/a))
Where a = T_o/P
Where T_o is the horizontal component of the tension-- a constant, and P is the weight/unit length.
Sadly, it was a foggy day, and never really cleared up, so I have no idea how far away it got, or how high it went, and I'm curious if it's possible to mathematical solve this to get a general idea.
The kite did however survive, and we used it again the next time we went to play with it. We never did try that one again though. It took too long to do the entire roll.
Strange the things we remember.
Anyone have any ideas as to how I could solve this?
Thanks for your feedback, and responses.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We used to do the same thing by just tying 100 ft strings together and letting the kite go. The kite would be several city blocks away and probably several hundred feet high.

One could approximate it by a caternary equation with height as a variable and then use a line integral. Then relate the length of string to the height.
 
Don't forget that the wind is pushing on the string.

If you were to repeat the experiement, using light monofilament fishing line would work better.
 
SteveDB said:
... I was reminded this morning about my childhood when a friend of mine and I ...

The primary components that I've been able to identify/remember at this point are:
Kite mass
String mass/unit length
Wind velocities- speed, trajectory/vectors
Initial height would've been 3 feet on my end
Atmospherric density differential due to altitude changes
Length of string/thread.
Area of kite body/face exposed to winds
Let me see if I understand this.

You want a solve a problem from an event from 40 years ago when you were a child, and apparently were able to remember such things as wind velocities, speed, trajectory and vectors?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
7K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K