Km and km: Is the Difference Real?

  • Thread starter Thread starter YoshiMoshi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that "Km" is not a valid unit for kilometers, as the SI system designates "k" (lowercase) for 1000 meters, while "K" (uppercase) is used in specific contexts like computing to represent 1024. The use of "K" for binary measurements is discouraged outside of IT, where it can create confusion with the metric system. The SI prefixes strictly refer to powers of ten, and using them for binary powers is incorrect. Overall, maintaining clarity in unit representation is essential to avoid misunderstandings in communication.
YoshiMoshi
Messages
233
Reaction score
10
Mod note: Moved from Precalc section of Homework & Coursework
1. Homework Statement


Km = 1024 m
km = 1000 m

Is this true or not? Because K = 2^10 while k = 10^3?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The SI system of units only allows the use of the kilo = 103 with the symbol k, so "Km" is not valid.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
Hi,

You want to confuse everyone ? Then do such things in your communication !

According to some 1998 standard you would use Kim for Kibi meter = 1024 m... (*)
But using that standard outside the IT world is nefarious. And inside, I 'm not aware it has gained any popularity either.

(*) Then there is a JEDEC standard draft that, again, should remain in the IT world, far, far from physics.

By the way, why did you post in a math forum ?
 
You will avoid confusion if K (1024) is used only in the context of counting information. For example, if you buy a 8 GB flash drive, you can be assured that it is an integer multiple of 1024 bytes. As far as I know, the SI system of units does not even address counting information, nor numbering systems other than base 10.

K (1024) should never be used for things like length in meters.

In natural language, we have homonyms. Words with different meanings that sound alike. In this case, K (1024) and k (1000) are like homonyms. It is up to all of us to keep them separate.
 
anorlunda said:
As far as I know, the SI system of units does not even address counting information, nor numbering systems other than base 10.
Indeed:
https://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/si_brochure_8_en.pdf said:
These SI prefixes refer strictly to powers of 10. They should not be used to indicate powers of 2 (for example, one kilobit represents 1000 bits and not 1024 bits). The IEC has adopted prefixes for binary powers in the international standard IEC 60027-2: 2005, third edition, Letter symbols to be used in electrical technology – Part 2: Telecommunications and electronics.

[...]

Although these prefixes are not part of the SI, they should be used in the field of information technology to avoid the incorrect usage of the SI prefixes.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
The Metre Convention was prejudiced. Full of speciests. Every one of the delegates came from a species with 10 fingers. There are alternatives that are much simpler and are easy to convert to binary:

With a hexadecimal number system:
Kilo = 2A = 400
Mega =214 = 100,000
Giga = 21E = 40,000,000

In octal:
Kilo =212=2,000
Mega = 224 = 4,000,000
Giga = 236=10,000,000,000
 
YoshiMoshi said:
Is this true or not?
Conventions are neither. They can be useful or not.
 
Back
Top