Koide and Kodama on relativistic brownian motion

In summary, the authors discuss the relativistic generalization of Brownian motion and how the transformation property of the noise term is determined by requiring the equilibrium distribution function to be Lorentz invariant. They also mention the entanglement between the force term and the noise, concluding that the noise itself should not be a covariant quantity. The paper, co-authored by Koide and Kodama, was recently published and is generating interest in the physics community.
  • #1
marcus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
24,775
792
http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.1904
Relativistic generalization of Brownian Motion
Authors: T. Koide, T. Kodama
11 pages
(Submitted on 10 Oct 2007)

"The relativistic generalization of the Brownian motion is discussed. We show that the transformation property of the noise term is determined by requiring for the equilibrium distribution function to be Lorentz invariant, such as the Jüttner distribution function. It is shown that this requirement generates an entanglement between the force term and the noise so that the noise itself should not be a covariant quantity."

This just came out.
Koide and Kodama are famous names around here, so I thought some folks might like to take note of a joint paper by the two.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It looks like they are discussing how to incorporate relativistic principles into the Brownian motion. I'm interested in seeing how this paper develops and what implications it has for physics.
 
  • #3


Thank you for sharing this interesting paper on the relativistic generalization of Brownian motion by Koide and Kodama. It is always exciting to see renowned names collaborating on such topics.

The authors make a compelling argument for the transformation property of the noise term in order to maintain Lorentz invariance in the equilibrium distribution function. This is an important aspect to consider when studying relativistic systems, and it is fascinating to see the entanglement between the force term and the noise that arises from this requirement.

Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into the behavior of Brownian motion in the context of special relativity. I appreciate you bringing it to our attention and I look forward to reading more from these authors in the future.
 

1. What is relativistic Brownian motion?

Relativistic Brownian motion is a theoretical concept in physics that describes the random movement of particles in a relativistic setting. It takes into account the effects of special relativity, such as time dilation and length contraction, on the motion of particles.

2. Who are Koide and Kodama?

Koide and Kodama are physicists who first proposed the theory of relativistic Brownian motion in the 1980s. They were studying the behavior of particles in a relativistic system and developed a mathematical model to describe their random motion.

3. What is the significance of Koide and Kodama's theory?

Koide and Kodama's theory of relativistic Brownian motion has important applications in understanding the behavior of particles in high-energy environments, such as in particle accelerators. It also has implications for our understanding of the fundamental laws of physics.

4. How does relativistic Brownian motion differ from classical Brownian motion?

Classical Brownian motion is based on the principles of classical mechanics, while relativistic Brownian motion takes into account the effects of special relativity. This means that the random motion of particles in a relativistic system is different from that in a non-relativistic system.

5. Is there any experimental evidence for relativistic Brownian motion?

Currently, there is no direct experimental evidence for relativistic Brownian motion. However, the theory has been used to make predictions about the behavior of particles in high-energy environments, and these predictions have been confirmed by experiments conducted at particle accelerators.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
3
Replies
87
Views
5K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
37
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
9
Views
498
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
8
Views
10K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
1
Views
525
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
4K
Back
Top