Kortewege de Vries equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter kurious
  • Start date Start date
kurious
Messages
633
Reaction score
0
In the Kortewege de Vries equation what is the physical origin of the
linear and non-linear terms? I'm thinking of the explanation of a water wave here.What properties of the water molecules cause the profile and stability of the wave?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Not familiar with that equation, but I am guessing that the molecule's dipole has something to do with this.

Edit : A quick search showed how important it was. It seems soliton solutions were actually discovered with it. Is water is the only material substance capable of this? (not counting solitons in light propagation)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The KdV equation is very important indeed, and one can find many references on it. Unfortunately, I don't know any which provides an actual physical interpretation for the several terms. At least not in a satisfactory manner. I also think that the exact same story goes for the Navier-Stockes equation. Everybody agree : it is a very important equation. But nobody agree on the interpretation of the several terms.

This is a very interesting question though. I wish someone will soon pop-up with a good answer.
 
Another eqn which admits stable (no dispersion) wave-like solutions is the Sine-Gordon-Eq:

D'Alembert(theta) + Sin(theta) = 0
(using suitable units)
[theta = theta(space,time), of cours]

This theta can be visualized as follows:

Consider a chain of pendulums, each being elastically connected on the top to its neighbours by springs. Theta measures the amplitude of "swinging"
of each pendulum (therefore function of space and time).
They swing in the usual way in the normal gravitational field: therefore the potential term Sin(theta).
The other term in the Sine-Gordon-EQN, namley the differential operator, comes from the continuum-limit of the elastic force modeled here by springs between the pendulums, as in the usual Klein-Gordon-EQN, or in every other harmonic oszilator.

Maybe the terms in the KdV-eqn have a similar origin.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top