Kronecker sum of more than two matrices?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the Kronecker sum of multiple matrices, specifically in the context of Hamiltonians in physics. The original poster seeks to express a total Hamiltonian as a sum of Kronecker products involving identity matrices and individual Hamiltonians.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to generalize the Kronecker sum definition for multiple Hamiltonians, questioning the validity of their approach. Some participants provide a definition of the total Hamiltonian using Kronecker products, while others express uncertainty about the correctness of the formulation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the Kronecker sum. Some have offered definitions and proofs related to the associativity of the Kronecker sum, but there is no explicit consensus on the original poster's approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of applying the Kronecker sum to more than two matrices, with concerns about the order of operations and the implications of associativity in their formulations.

Earthland
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The question arises from this quote from wikipedia's article about kronecker product:

Kronecker sums appear naturally in physics when considering ensembles of non-interacting systems. Let Hi be the Hamiltonian of the i-th such system. Then the total Hamiltonian of the ensemble is
c2e0b6679eb0d88a8ec2d35a7d1a448f.png


I have to write this Htot as a ordinary sum over kronecker products of unity matrix and Hi-s.

Homework Equations



Kronecker sum for two matrices is defined as

3f1676452a4f1311f5d7a165e319b184.png


If A is n × n, B is m × m and Ik denotes the k × k identity matrix.

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, as I undesratnd, now instead of A and B we have simply Hi and there should be sum kind of sum over i. But the Kronecker sum is defined only for a pair of matrices and it isn't commutative, so the order is important. I tried something like this, for three H-s:

upload_2015-2-27_12-59-47.png


But it doesn't look very elegant and I have no idea if this could be true. Any advice?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2015-2-27_12-22-46.png
    upload_2015-2-27_12-22-46.png
    3.1 KB · Views: 621
Physics news on Phys.org
The definition is as follows

c2e0b6679eb0d88a8ec2d35a7d1a448f.png


H_{\text{Tot}} =\left( H_1 \otimes \mathbb{I} \otimes \mathbb{I} \otimes ... \right)+ \left(\mathbb{I} \otimes H_2 \otimes \mathbb{I} \otimes ... \right) + \left(\mathbb{I} \otimes \mathbb{I} \otimes H_3 \otimes ... \right) + ...
 
Are you sure? Thank you!
 
Proof:
Kronecker sum is associative.

In other words.
The Kronecker sum of two matrices is, as you wrote,
X=A\oplus B = A\otimes\mathbb{I}_B + \mathbb{I}_A\otimes{B}

Now, since the sum ##A\oplus B## is a matrix, ##X##, the Kronecker sum
Y= X\oplus C = X\otimes\mathbb{I}_C + \mathbb{I}_X\otimes C = (A\otimes\mathbb{I}_B + \mathbb{I}_A\otimes{B})\otimes\mathbb{I}_C + \mathbb{I}_X\otimes{C}
Of course ##\mathbb{I}_X=\mathbb{I}_A\otimes\mathbb{I}_B##, which gives
Y= A\otimes\mathbb{I}_B\otimes\mathbb{I}_C + \mathbb{I}_A\otimes B\otimes\mathbb{I}_C + \mathbb{I}_A\otimes\mathbb{I}_B\otimes{C}

##Z= Y\oplus D = ## Keep going... :)
 
Thank you very much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K