MHB Kunal's question at Yahoo Answers regarding Lagrange multipliers

MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Use Lagrange multipliers to find the point (a,b) on the graph of y=e^{4 x}, where the value ab is minimal?

Use Lagrange multipliers to find the point (a,b) on the graph of y=e^{4 x}, where the value ab is as small as possible.

I know how to use lagrange multipliers but it isn't working when I follow the formula.

Please help,

Thanks.

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Kunal,

We are given the objective function:

$$f(a,b)=ab$$

Subject to the contraint:

$$g(a,b)=b-e^{4a}=0$$

Using Lagrange multipliers, we obtain the system:

$$b=\lambda\left(-4e^{4a} \right)$$

$$a=\lambda(1)$$

And so we find:

$$\lambda=a=-\frac{b}{4e^{4a}}\implies b=-4ae^{4a}$$

Now, substituting for $b$ into the constraint, there results:

$$-4ae^{4a}-e^{4a}=0$$

Divide through by $-e^{4a}\ne0$:

$$4a+1=0\implies a=-\frac{1}{4}$$

Hence:

$$b=e^{-1}=\frac{1}{e}$$

And so we find the value of the objective function at this point is:

$$f\left(-\frac{1}{4},\frac{1}{e} \right)=-\frac{1}{4e}$$

If we observe that at another point on the constraint, such as $\left(0,1 \right)$, we have:

$$f(0,1)=0$$

Since this is greater than the objective function's value at the critical point we found, we can then conclude with assurance that:

$$f_{\min}=-\frac{1}{4e}$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top