MHB Kunal's question at Yahoo Answers regarding Lagrange multipliers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using Lagrange multipliers to minimize the product ab on the curve defined by y = e^(4x). The objective function is f(a, b) = ab, with the constraint g(a, b) = b - e^(4a) = 0. The solution process leads to the critical point (a, b) = (-1/4, 1/e), yielding a minimum value of f(-1/4, 1/e) = -1/(4e). It is noted that this minimum is less than the value at another point on the constraint, confirming the solution. The final conclusion is that the minimum value of ab is -1/(4e).
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Use Lagrange multipliers to find the point (a,b) on the graph of y=e^{4 x}, where the value ab is minimal?

Use Lagrange multipliers to find the point (a,b) on the graph of y=e^{4 x}, where the value ab is as small as possible.

I know how to use lagrange multipliers but it isn't working when I follow the formula.

Please help,

Thanks.

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Kunal,

We are given the objective function:

$$f(a,b)=ab$$

Subject to the contraint:

$$g(a,b)=b-e^{4a}=0$$

Using Lagrange multipliers, we obtain the system:

$$b=\lambda\left(-4e^{4a} \right)$$

$$a=\lambda(1)$$

And so we find:

$$\lambda=a=-\frac{b}{4e^{4a}}\implies b=-4ae^{4a}$$

Now, substituting for $b$ into the constraint, there results:

$$-4ae^{4a}-e^{4a}=0$$

Divide through by $-e^{4a}\ne0$:

$$4a+1=0\implies a=-\frac{1}{4}$$

Hence:

$$b=e^{-1}=\frac{1}{e}$$

And so we find the value of the objective function at this point is:

$$f\left(-\frac{1}{4},\frac{1}{e} \right)=-\frac{1}{4e}$$

If we observe that at another point on the constraint, such as $\left(0,1 \right)$, we have:

$$f(0,1)=0$$

Since this is greater than the objective function's value at the critical point we found, we can then conclude with assurance that:

$$f_{\min}=-\frac{1}{4e}$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top