L1 Lagrangian Point: SOHO & ACE Time + Human Mission Possibility

  • Thread starter Thread starter hhhmortal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian Point
AI Thread Summary
SOHO and ACE took several months to reach the L1 Lagrangian point, which is approximately 1.496 million km from Earth. Recent spacecraft are not designed for human servicing due to the high costs and complexities involved, making unmanned missions more economical and practical. The ACE satellite is set for retirement in 2024, raising questions about the feasibility of human missions to L1, especially considering the increased radiation and temperature challenges. While some believe astronauts could perform tasks more efficiently than robots, the current infrastructure and costs heavily favor unmanned missions. Overall, advancements in launch costs could change the dynamics of human missions to L1 in the future.
hhhmortal
Messages
175
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know how long SOHO and ACE took to get to the L1 lagrangian point. It is in average 1.496 million km away, I am wondering how fast a human space flight servicing mission would take. Also if it is possible to send it for a long mission seeing that the radiation dosage increases and temperature of spacecraft increases too.

Thanks.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Not sure how long it took, but I do know that none of the recent spacecraft are designed to be human serviceable and if they break then they will be retired. Having a spacecraft that uses or requires human serviceablity (i.e. Hubble) turned into something of a nightmare, which most people would rather avoid. It turns out that for the same cost of making something human serviceable you can build several non-serviceable spacecraft .
 
They are cheaper to replace than service. We can barely make it to the moon with manned craft.
 
Exactly what I thought. In essence sending a unmanned spacecraft will certainly be cheaper than a servicing mission, but does this mean we should never send Astronauts to space. The ACE is due for retirement on 2024. Could it ever be viable to go to the L1 point assuming the cost of launching into orbit is significantly reduced. I'd like to think that astronauts can do a more efficient job than just the robotics in an unmanned space craft.

Could anyone tell me what the space shuttle radiation shielding is? And how much dosage of radiation per sec or day do astronauts receive in orbit?
 
Thanks very much.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...
Back
Top