Lagrange equation: when exactly does it apply?

AI Thread Summary
The Lagrange equation applies to systems with holonomic constraints, but constraining forces like normal forces do not necessarily make a system holonomic. The Euler-Lagrange equation can incorporate non-conservative forces, such as friction, on the right-hand side, which allows for broader applications. The modified equation, which includes generalized forces \(Q_j\), is applicable in systems where external forces are present, though its derivation is not always detailed in standard texts. Kinetic energy can indeed have explicit position dependence, particularly in non-Cartesian coordinates, which affects the terms in the Lagrange equations. A thorough review of foundational texts like Goldstein can clarify these concepts further.
Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
Hi! Does the Lagrange equation ONLY apply when the constraints are holonomic? What about the constraining forces acting on the system (i.e. normal force, or other perpendicular forces), do they make a system holonomic?

What about the Lagrange equation with the general force on the right hand side. I read in Goldstein that it can be, for instance, a non-conservative frictional force. Why? Where did that come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BTW, I am talking about the Euler-Lagrange equation. This one, $$ \sum_j \frac{\partial L }{\partial q_j} - \frac{d}{d t} \frac{\partial L }{\partial \dot{q_j}} = 0$$ in case there was any confusion.

But what is up with the modified equation, ##\frac{\partial L }{\partial q_j} - \frac{d}{d t} \frac{\partial L }{\partial \dot{q_j}} = Q_j## ? When does this apply to a system, and for which generalized forces ##Q_j##s? It was not derived in Goldstein's book, just given.
 
Another question, if somebody wants to answer: does ##\frac{\partial T}{\partial q_j}##, where ##T## is the kinetic energy of the system, always equal zero? Or do there exist situations where the kinetic energy has an explicit dependence on position?

It might seem like a strange question because kinetic energy is defined using total velocity, but I ask because one form of Lagrange's equation is ##\frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial T}{\partial \dot{q_j}} - \frac{\partial T}{\partial q_j} = Q_j##.
 
Nikitin said:
Another question, if somebody wants to answer: does ##\frac{\partial T}{\partial q_j}##, where ##T## is the kinetic energy of the system, always equal zero? Or do there exist situations where the kinetic energy has an explicit dependence on position?

It certainly can, in spherical coordinates (or polar) you have position dependence in the kinetic term.
 
  • Like
Likes Nikitin
Check http://physics.clarku.edu/courses/201/sreading/AJP73_March2005_265-272.pdf paper out. Does that help answer your questions?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Nikitin
I hate to answer your question this way, but if you reread Goldstein chapter 1 and 2 enough, you will answer your questions. This was true for me.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top