Lagrangian of a centrifugal regulator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on deriving the Lagrangian for a centrifugal regulator, specifically using the formula L = T - V, where T represents kinetic energy and V represents potential energy. Participants emphasize the importance of including rotational kinetic energy terms and correcting the gravitational potential energy component. Key issues identified include the need to account for the rotational inertia of the spheres and the correct interpretation of the distance from the pivot to the center of mass. The conversation concludes with a participant expressing gratitude for assistance in refining their Lagrangian formulation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with kinetic and potential energy concepts
  • Knowledge of rotational motion and moment of inertia
  • Ability to derive equations of motion using Lagrange's equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Lagrange's equations for simple systems, such as a conical pendulum
  • Learn about rotational kinetic energy and its implications in Lagrangian mechanics
  • Review the concept of moment of inertia and its calculation for different shapes
  • Examine resources on gravitational potential energy and its role in Lagrangian formulations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on classical mechanics, as well as engineers working with dynamic systems and control mechanisms.

dynamicskillingme
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


d7d00d440782ff99c7d6502f9f5f1ae3.png


Homework Equations



L = T-V

The Attempt at a Solution


I got a formula for the lagrangian as
gif.gif
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dynamicskillingme said:
I got a formula for the lagrangian as
529%255E2%2520%26plus%3B%25204amg%25281-cos%255Ctheta%2529&hash=995146cddd4c7f1b6db66ba2467e4208.png
check the L written above and set up the Lagrange's equations of motion...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dynamicskillingme
drvrm said:
check the L written above and set up the Lagrange's equations of motion...
Its more I don't know if the L is correct and wanted to check what the derivation is with someone else's because I'm pretty sure my derivation is wrong.
 
dynamicskillingme said:
Its more I don't know if the L is correct and wanted to check what the derivation is with someone else's because I'm pretty sure my derivation is wrong.

the lagrangian is T- V , where T is kinetic energy and V is potential energy of the system.
The choice of generalized coordinate is important- you may consult introductory book /material on the Langrangian Method and try to set up equations for simple system like a conical pendulum and then move on to the present problem .
you can get a short introduction in the following;
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/aeronaut...namics-spring-2003/lecture-notes/lecture7.pdf
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dynamicskillingme
dynamicskillingme said:
Its more I don't know if the L is correct and wanted to check what the derivation is with someone else's because I'm pretty sure my derivation is wrong.

your regulator has two degrees of freedom one described by angle si and the other by angle theta.
so the kinetic energy can be written using the rotational motion about si and about theta.if you take vertical axis as z then the other motion is in x-y plane and can be described by time rate of change of theta .
the potential energy can be written using the position of two messes at any theta.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dynamicskillingme
dynamicskillingme said:
Its more I don't know if the L is correct and wanted to check what the derivation is with someone else's because I'm pretty sure my derivation is wrong.
You have neglected the rotational inertia of the spheres about their centers. This will add additional terms to T. Also, check the sign of the gravitational potential energy part of L.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dynamicskillingme
I don't believe the balls are allowed to rotate about their centers. Why wouldn't the gravitational potential be positive? Also this might just be me being ill but are these the correct L eq's

gif.gif


gif.gif
 
dynamicskillingme said:
I don't believe the balls are allowed to rotate about their centers.
Each ball does rotate as either ##\theta## or ##\psi## changes. Consider a ball attached to the end of a stick as shown in the figure below. As the stick rotates through an angle θ, the ball also rotates through θ.
Why wouldn't the gravitational potential be positive?
The potential energy is subtracted in the Lagrangian: L = T - V. You got the sign correct for the spring potential energy.
 

Attachments

  • Ball on stick.png
    Ball on stick.png
    2 KB · Views: 702
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dynamicskillingme
Yeah I agree with that, but what other term would that introduce?
Also wouldn't the gravity term be the opposite direction to the spring?
 
  • #10
dynamicskillingme said:
Yeah I agree with that, but what other term would that introduce?
It's just a kinetic energy term due to rotation about the center of mass.
Also wouldn't the gravity term be the opposite direction to the spring?
If θ increases, both the spring potential energy and the gravitational potential energy increase.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dynamicskillingme
  • #11
Okay so what would the term be?
 
  • #12
Check your text, or do a web search on "rotational kinetic energy". It involves the moment of inertia and angular speed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dynamicskillingme
  • #13
In the potential energy of gravity term, the distance ##2a## is not quite the correct distance. You need to use the distance from the pivot ##O## to the center of mass of a ball.

In your Lagrangian you use the symbol ##l##. What does that stand for?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dynamicskillingme
  • #14
Could you possibly write out the correct Lagrangian as I feel like I'm stumbling around it and would love to inspect the correct one. And sorry there is a note at the start of my work I forgot and it just says
gif.gif
 
  • #15
dynamicskillingme said:
Could you possibly write out the correct Lagrangian as I feel like I'm stumbling around it and would love to inspect the correct one. And sorry there is a note at the start of my work I forgot and it just says
gif.gif

This is not quite the correct expression for ##l##. The ##R/2## part is incorrect. ##l## should be the distance from ##O## to the center of mass of one of the balls.

I won't write out what I get for the Lagrangian since this is your assignment. I have pointed out a few places where your expression for the Lagrangian is either incomplete or incorrect:

(1) Your first two terms represent the kinetic energy due to motion of the center of mass of the balls. In addition, you need to include terms representing the kinetic energy due to rotation of the balls about their center of mass as ##\theta## and ##\psi## change.
(2) The overall sign of the gravitational energy term needs correction.
(3) In the gravity term, you have not used the correct distance from ##O## to the center of mass of a ball.

To help with (1), consider how you would write the kinetic energy of a sphere of moment of inertia ##I## rotating with angular speed ##\omega## about an axis through its center.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dynamicskillingme
  • #16
Boom, found some worked solutions to give me tips along what I could be missing.
gif.gif

That goes to
gif.gif

gif.gif

and
gif.gif

gif.gif

(please be right, also I just saw the gravity term isn't right but its late. will change)
 
  • #17
dynamicskillingme said:
gif.gif
That's getting very close to the correct ##L##. However, you need to include a rotational KE term associated with ##\dot{\theta}## as well as with ##\dot{\psi}##. And, as you say, the coefficient for the gravity terms needs to be corrected.
gif.gif
When evaluating ##\frac{\partial{L}}{\partial \theta}##, how did you get factors of ##\dot{\theta}## to appear?

I believe your expression for ##\frac{\partial{L}}{\partial \dot\psi}## is correct. In ##\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial{L}}{\partial \dot\psi}##, you dropped a factor of ##\dot\psi## the last term.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dynamicskillingme
  • #18
gif.gif

gif.gif

gif.gif

gif.gif

gif.gif

Maybe
 
  • #19
dynamicskillingme said:
gif.gif
This expression for ##L## looks correct to me as long as the distance ##l## has the correct interpretation.

Everything else looks good except for your result for ##\frac{\partial L}{\partial \theta}## :
gif.gif
.
The gravity term is not correct and I think you might have dropped a factor of 2 in the last term.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dynamicskillingme
  • #20
Praise the gods!, I changed the factor from 4 to 2 because I put l instead of 2a (which was meant to be 2a+R). Thank you so much for your help on this thread! its crazy how much you can forget between academic years!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K