Lagrangian of a double pendulum, finding kinetic energy

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the Lagrangian for a double pendulum, highlighting the potential and kinetic energy equations for both masses involved. The potential energy for the first mass is given as U1 = m1gL1, while the second mass's potential energy includes contributions from both pendulum arms. The kinetic energy for the second mass incorporates a cosine term, which arises from the vector addition of the velocities of the two masses and is explained through the cosine of the angle between them. This cosine term is essential for accurately calculating the total kinetic energy using the cosine rule. Understanding these derivations is crucial for grasping the dynamics of the double pendulum system.
P Felds
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Find the lagrangian of the double pendulum, kinetic energy
Relevant Equations
L=T-U
This is from Taylor's classical mechanichs, 11.4, example of finding the Lagrangian of the double pendulum
Relevant figure attached below
Angle between the two velocities of second mass is
$$\phi_2-\phi_1$$
Potential energy
$$U_1=m_1gL_1$$
$$U_2=m_2g[L_1\cos(1-\phi_1)+L_2(1-\phi_2)]$$
$$(U\phi_1,phi_2)=m_1gL_1+m_2g[L_1\cos(1-\phi_1)+L_2(1-\phi_2)]$$
Kinetic energy of the second mass in the double pendulum
$$T_1=\frac{1}{2}m_1L_1^2\dot\phi_1^2$$
$$T_2=\frac{1}{2} m_2[L_1^2\dot\phi_1^2+2L_1L_2\dot\phi_2\dot\phi_1\cos(\phi_1-\phi_2)+L_2^2\dot\phi_2^2]$$
Where $$ T_2=\frac{1}{2}m_2(v_1+L_2\dot\phi_2)^2$$
I am trouble understanding the cos term here. Does it come from the unit vector? Can someone explain why it's involved, because I could not follow why it's here after squaring the velocity for the second kinetic energy
$$2L_1L_2\dot\phi_2\dot\phi_1\cos(\phi_1-\phi_2)$$
 

Attachments

  • 20220222_155648.jpg
    20220222_155648.jpg
    19.4 KB · Views: 171
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want to understand where the KE of the second mass comes from, then start with the position of the second mass: $$(x, y) = (L_1\sin \phi_1 +L_2 \sin \phi_2, L_1\cos \phi_1 + L_2\cos \phi_2)$$Then differentiate.

The ##\cos(\phi_1 - \phi_2)## term arises from the relevant trig identity for a cosine of a difference of angles.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and P Felds
Thank you very much
 
You get the velocity of the second particle by adding the two contributions ##L_1 \dot{\phi}_1## (varying ##\phi_1## whilst keeping ##\phi_2## fixed) and ##L_2 \dot{\phi}_2## (varying ##\phi_2## whilst keeping ##\phi_1## fixed) vectorially. Joining the vectors tip to tail, the angle between them is ##\pi - (\phi_2 - \phi_1)## so cosine rule states ##v^2 = L_1^2 \dot{\phi}_1^2 + L_2^2 \dot{\phi}_2^2 + 2L_1 L_2 \dot{\phi}_1 \dot{\phi}_2 \cos{(\phi_2 - \phi_1)}##.
 
At first, I derived that: $$\nabla \frac 1{\mu}=-\frac 1{{\mu}^3}\left((1-\beta^2)+\frac{\dot{\vec\beta}\cdot\vec R}c\right)\vec R$$ (dot means differentiation with respect to ##t'##). I assume this result is true because it gives valid result for magnetic field. To find electric field one should also derive partial derivative of ##\vec A## with respect to ##t##. I've used chain rule, substituted ##\vec A## and used derivative of product formula. $$\frac {\partial \vec A}{\partial t}=\frac...