Lambert W Function: Solving for the Inverse of x^x = y

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter arpon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Homework
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the inverse of the function defined by \( f(x) = x^x \) and whether a closed form expression exists for this inverse. The conversation includes theoretical aspects of the Lambert W function and its application in solving the equation \( x^x = y \).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the existence of a closed form expression for the inverse of \( f(x) = x^x \).
  • Another participant introduces the Lambert W function as a potential tool for solving \( x^x = y \), suggesting that \( x = \exp(W(\ln(y))) \).
  • A later reply acknowledges the correctness of the previous participant's approach after further consideration, clarifying that taking the logarithm leads to the equation \( x \ln(x) = \ln(y) \) instead of \( x e^x = y \).
  • Participants discuss the transformation of the equation using \( u = \ln(x) \), leading to \( u e^u = \ln(y) \) and ultimately \( x = \exp(W(\ln(y))) \).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence of a closed form for the inverse function, with some suggesting the Lambert W function provides a solution while others remain uncertain about the overall implications.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the question of whether a closed form exists, and participants rely on specific transformations and definitions that may not be universally accepted.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying mathematical functions, particularly in the context of inverse functions and special functions like the Lambert W function.

arpon
Messages
234
Reaction score
16
If, ##f(x)=x^x##, then, f-1(x)=?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't think there's a closed form expression for that.
 
Nicely done! I misread your answer at first and thought you had it wrong but saw that you are correct after working it out for myself. The Lambert W function is inverse to f(x)= xe^x but taking the logarithm of both sides of x^x= y gives xln(x)= ln(y) not xe^x= y.

Instead, once you have xln(x)= ln(y), let u= ln(x). Of course, then, x= e^{ln(x)}= e^u so the equation becomes
ue^u= ln(y), u= ln(x)= W(ln(y)) so that, as you say, x= exp(W(ln(y)).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
851
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K