Laminar Pipe Flow: Displacement, and Momentum Thicknesses

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of displacement and momentum thicknesses in laminar pipe flow, particularly comparing these concepts to flow over a flat plate. Participants explore the definitions and implications of these thicknesses in different flow conditions, including fully developed laminar flow.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the methods for calculating displacement and momentum thicknesses in laminar pipe flow are analogous to those used for flow over a flat plate.
  • Another participant suggests that in the entrance region of a pipe, where thicknesses are small relative to the pipe radius, the flow can be treated similarly to flow over a flat plate, but notes that this changes as thicknesses increase.
  • There is a query about the calculation of displacement thickness for fully developed laminar flow in pipes, with one participant asserting that in this case, the displacement thickness equals the radius of the pipe.
  • A participant expresses confusion regarding how the displacement thickness can be equal to the radius, emphasizing the definition of displacement thickness as related to the deflection of streamlines due to the boundary layer.
  • Another participant questions the necessity of defining displacement thickness in fully developed flow, arguing that the concept of a boundary layer loses significance when the flow is fully developed and a stable velocity profile is established.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relevance and definition of displacement thickness in fully developed laminar flow, indicating a lack of consensus on this topic. Some participants support the idea that it can be defined as the pipe radius, while others challenge this notion and question the need for such a definition.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of applying boundary layer concepts in different flow scenarios, particularly in relation to the definitions and calculations of displacement and momentum thicknesses. There are unresolved assumptions regarding the applicability of these concepts in fully developed flow conditions.

Disquoveri
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello. I'm new to the forums. I apologize if I have posted this in the wrong topic area.

I'm new to this hydrodynamics area and I'm trying to learn the concepts of boundary layer thicknesses. My question is about laminar pipe flow and calculating displacement and momentum thicknesses. I was wondering if finding the displacement and momentum thicknesses in a pipe flow is the same as finding them in flow over a flat-plate.

I found the displacement thickness over a flat plate to be:
## \delta_1 = \int_0^\infty (1-\frac{u\rho}{u_{\infty}\rho_{\infty}})dy ##

And the momentum thickness is:
## \delta_2 = \int_0^\infty \frac{\rho u}{\rho_{\infty}u_{\infty}} (1-\frac{u\rho}{u_{\infty}\rho_{\infty}})dy ##

Thank you.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
In the region where the thicknesses are small compared to the radius of the pipe, you can treat flow in the entrance region to a pipe as flow over a flat plate. However, as the thicknesses become greater, neglect of the curvature becomes less acceptable.

Chet
 
Hello Sir,
I just want to know further in this topic that
"Can we calculate displacement thickness for fully developed laminar flow in pipes"
 
cabon7969 said:
Hello Sir,
I just want to know further in this topic that
"Can we calculate displacement thickness for fully developed laminar flow in pipes"
For fully developed laminar flow in pipes, the boundary layer has penetrated to the center of the pipe, and the displacement thickness is R.

Chet
 
Hello Sir ,
I did not understand how the displacement thickness becomes R.
According to me, displacement thickness is the distance by which streamline get deflected due to effect of boundary layer and also it can be stated as imaginary increase in thickness of wall due to boundary layer.
But for the fully developed laminar flow this thickness will be constant, but i don't know what it will be ?
 
For a fully-developed pipe flow, why do you feel the need to define a displacement thickness in the first place? Once the flow is fully-developed, the concept of a boundary layer is somewhat meaningless. There is already a well-defined, well-predicted velocity profile.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
19K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
3K