Laplace transform and tabular integration

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of integration techniques, specifically in the context of Laplace transforms and the integration of exponential and trigonometric functions. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the use of tabular integration versus traditional integration by parts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the necessity and applicability of tabular integration compared to standard integration by parts. There are differing opinions on whether tabular integration is essential for solving the problem at hand, with some suggesting that integration by parts can suffice.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into their experiences with integration techniques. Some have offered to help by reviewing the original poster's steps if they share them, indicating a collaborative effort to clarify the method of integration being discussed.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of varying familiarity with integration techniques among participants, which may affect the discussion. The original poster's reference to tabular integration suggests a potential gap in shared knowledge within the group.

robertjford80
Messages
388
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Screenshot2012-06-05at81800PM.png



The Attempt at a Solution



I can't get the jump to [e^-st(-s cost bt + b sin bt)]/(s^2+b^2)

They say they have to use integration by parts but when e and a trig ratio are involved that requires tabular integration. They're obviously not using tabular integration and I don't see why not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Most classes do not use tabular integration, I've never heard of it. You can use integration by parts (twice, and you must do it correctly (otherwise you will find 0=0)). If you know tabular integration, then you have a technique that many of us do not know.

If you tried the integration by parts, and it did not work, show us your steps and we should be able to give a clue.

Tabular integration is not "required".
 
Never heard the name. It's still integration by parts. Show us the steps if you had trouble integrating.

And I think you only have to integrate twice.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K