Laplace transforms, heaviside step functions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around Laplace transforms and the application of Heaviside step functions in the context of a piecewise function defined by f(t). Participants are exploring the transformation of functions and the implications of negative signs in the context of the Heaviside function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the sign of the exponential term in the Laplace transform and its relation to the Heaviside function. They are also discussing the transformation of a piecewise function into Heaviside notation and the manipulation of terms involving sine functions.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the transformation process and the use of trigonometric identities. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the time-shift property of the Laplace transform and how it relates to the piecewise function.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating potential typos in the original problem statement and discussing the assumptions made regarding the transformation steps. There is a focus on understanding the mathematical identities involved and their application in the context of Laplace transforms.

missavvy
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Hey guys! I just have a question regarding some notes I've been looking at and trying to understand...

Homework Statement


eq0018MP.gif

Taking the transform:

eq0019MP.gif


Just wondering, can someone explain to me why the e-3s/s is positive, and not negative because it is originally -u3(t)...

Another quick one:

Write this in terms of Heaviside function:

f(t) =
{ 0, 0 <= t <= pi
{ -sin3t, t >= pi

1) So you would get f(t) = -(upit)sin3t

And somehow it ends up as f(t) = (upit)sin(3(t-pi))
Can someone explain this step as well? Just what happened to the negative in front of it, and why it became 3(t-pi)

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
missavvy said:
Hey guys! I just have a question regarding some notes I've been looking at and trying to understand...

Homework Statement


eq0018MP.gif

Taking the transform:

eq0019MP.gif


Just wondering, can someone explain to me why the e-3s/s is positive, and not negative because it is originally -u3(t)...
It's probably just a typo in the original problem.

Another quick one:

Write this in terms of Heaviside function:

f(t) =
{ 0, 0 <= t <= pi
{ -sin3t, t >= pi

1) So you would get f(t) = -(upit)sin3t

And somehow it ends up as f(t) = (upit)sin(3(t-pi))
Can someone explain this step as well? Just what happened to the negative in front of it, and why it became 3(t-pi)
Try expanding sin[3(t-pi)] using the angle addition formula for sine. The reason it was written this way is probably because it's now in the form where the time-shift property of the Laplace transform can be applied.
 

Attachments

  • eq0018MP.gif
    eq0018MP.gif
    1.1 KB · Views: 450
  • eq0019MP.gif
    eq0019MP.gif
    2.3 KB · Views: 457
Thanks for the first one that makes sense.

For the second one, I attempted using the identity and get:

f(t) = -upi(t)sin(3t)
= -L{upi(t)sin3(t-pi+pi)}
= -L{upi(t)[sin3(t-pi)cos(3pi) + sin(3pi)cos3(t-pi)]}
taking the transform:
= -e-pi*s(3cos(3pi) + 3s*sin(3pi) / s2 + 9

Hmm I don't understand how it is suppose to be just upi(t)sin(3(t-pi)) = e-pi*s(3) / (s2 + 9)(s2 + 1)

What happened when you add the pi and subtract it, and what happened to the negative in front of it all?
 
What are cos(3π) and sin(3π) equal to? Also, I didn't mean that you needed to use the time-shift property to get that result. It's just basic trig.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K