Laplace's Eqn on half an annulus

  • Thread starter Thread starter Trail_Builder
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding solutions to Laplace's equation in polar coordinates within a specified region of a half annulus. The original poster is tasked with determining a function that satisfies the equation given specific boundary conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster discusses their understanding of separating variables to find a general solution but expresses confusion regarding the absence of a log(r) term in the problem statement. They question the implications of this omission in the context of the half annulus.

Discussion Status

Some participants are engaging by asking the original poster to clarify their working steps, suggesting that there may be a misunderstanding or error in their approach. The conversation is exploring the nature of the solution and the boundary conditions without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes that the log(r) term complicates their determination of coefficients and questions why it is not included in the problem's requirements, indicating a potential gap in understanding the setup of the problem.

Trail_Builder
Messages
148
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that Laplace’s equation ∇^2(φ) = 0 in polar coordinates (r,θ) has solutions proportional to r^(±α)*sin(αθ), r^(±α)*cos(αθ) for any constant α.

Find the function φ satisfying Laplace’s equation in the region a < r < b, 0 < θ < pi, where φ(a,θ) = (sin(θ))^3, φ(b,θ) = φ(r,0) = φ(r,pi) = 0.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Basically, I know how to find the general solution for Laplace's Eqn in polars, by separating variables. However, I can't reconcile this general solution with what the (first bit of the) question says. In particular, why does the question ignore the log(r) term? I know this term would normally disappear by requiring regularly at the origin, but we have half an annulus, so this doesn't apply. This log(r) term is also making the process of determining coefficient a bit of a nightmare, to the point of me thinking I'm missing something.



Any help would be greatly appreciated :) Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you separate the variables?
 
yeah, I separated the variables in the usual way, to get a solution. but the solution has a constant term and a log(r) term, in addition to the "r^(±α)*sin(αθ), r^(±α)*cos(αθ)" terms they mention. and I am not sure why the qu doesn't have all the term I have :S
 
Show your working, I think you may have made a mistake.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K