Laplace's equation on an annulus with Nuemann BCs

  • Thread starter Thread starter nathan12343
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laplace's equation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving Laplace's equation within a circular annulus with Neumann boundary conditions. The proposed solution involves separating variables, leading to equations for the angular and radial components. The periodic boundary conditions imply that the angular component must be continuous, resulting in specific values for the parameter λ. The user expresses confusion about determining the constant A02 for the n=0 case to satisfy both boundary conditions simultaneously. The thread concludes with a note that the user intended to post in a different forum.
nathan12343
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solve Laplace's equation inside a circular annulus (a<r<b) subject to the boundary conditions \frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{r}}(a,\theta) = f(\theta)\text{, }\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{r}}(b,\theta) = g(\theta)


Homework Equations


Assume solutions of the form u(r,\theta) = G(r)\phi(\theta). This leads to an equation for phi and G, both of which can be solved by substitution:

<br /> \frac{d^2\phi}{{d\theta}^2} = -\lambda^2\phi<br />
<br /> \phi = A\cos{\lambda\theta} + B\sin{\lambda\theta}<br />

<br /> r^2\frac{d^2G}{{dr}^2} + r\frac{dG}{dr} - n^2G = 0<br />
<br /> G = c_{1n}r^{-n} + c_{2n}r^n\text{ for } n\ne0<br />
<br /> G = c_{10} + c_{20}\ln(r)\text{ for } n=0<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


Periodic boundary conditions require that u and its derivative with respect to theta be continuous between -pi and pi. Then means \lambda = n for all n greater than or equal to zero. We can write,

<br /> u(r,\theta) = &amp;\, A_{01} + A_{02}\ln(r) + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(A_{n1}r^n + A_{n2}r^{-n})\cos{n\theta} + (B_{n1}r^n + B_{n2}r^{-n})\sin{n\theta}<br />
<br /> \frac{\partial{u(r,\theta)}}{\partial{r}} = &amp;\, A_{02}r^{-1} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(nA_{n1}r^{n-1} + -nA_{n2}r^{-n-1})\cos{n\theta} + (nB_{n1}r^{n-1} - nB_{n2}r^{-n-1})\sin{n\theta} <br />

I know that I can set everything in parentheses in front of the cosines and sines above equal to some constant when I set r=a,b to enforce the boundary conditions on the edge of the annulus. This leaves me with two equations in two unknowns for all the A's and B's with n greater than 1. My problem is how to set A_{02}[/tex] such that it will work at both boundaries. It seems like I really need two constants to match to the boundary for when n=0. Am I missing something?<br /> <br /> Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please disregard this - I meant to post in Calculus & Beyond.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top