A Laser beam represented with complex conjugate?

betelgeuse91
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Boyd - Nonlinear Optics page 5, there says 'Here a laser beam whose electric field strength is represented as $$\widetilde{E}(t) = Ee^{-iwt} + c.c$$But why is it written like this? Is it because the strength is the real part of the complex electric field? Then why doesn't he divide it by 2 after adding those two?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's simply a representation of a time-dependent E-field. Your ##\tilde E(t)## is real, by the way:$$\tilde E(t)= 2E\cos(\omega t)$$and that ##2E## is some arbitrary amplitude.

You might enjoy some nice animations, like here or here
 
BvU said:
It's simply a representation of a time-dependent E-field. Your ##\tilde E(t)## is real, by the way:$$\tilde E(t)= 2E\cos(\omega t)$$and that ##2E## is some arbitrary amplitude.

You might enjoy some nice animations, like here or here

I see. Thank you!
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top