Laser light vs. synchrotron light in ARPES measurements

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the differences between laser light and synchrotron light in Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy (ARPES) measurements, particularly regarding their ability to cover momentum space and the implications for experimental results.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that synchrotron light can cover a wider area of momentum space compared to laser light, as referenced in a paper by M. Hashimoto et al.
  • One participant mentions that synchrotron radiation has much higher brightness than lasers, citing a specific document for further reading.
  • Another participant discusses the limitations of laser light in imparting linear momentum, suggesting that this restricts allowed transitions in ARPES measurements, particularly for single crystals.
  • A different viewpoint is presented, stating that the maximum momentum achievable is determined by the wavelength of the light, with lasers typically having longer wavelengths than synchrotron light.
  • One participant argues that brightness is not the primary factor in this context, asserting that lasers can have higher brightness than synchrotrons and mentioning ongoing developments in x-ray free electron lasers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the roles of brightness and wavelength in the effectiveness of laser versus synchrotron light in ARPES measurements. There is no consensus on which light source is definitively superior for covering momentum space.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on specific definitions of brightness and momentum transfer, and the discussion does not resolve the implications of these factors on experimental outcomes.

vatlychatran
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
In ARPES measurements, people say that the laser light cannot cover a wide area of momentum space whereas the synchrotron light can (M. Hashimoto et al., Nat. Phys. 10 (2014) 483). Why is that?

(Figure 3a in the paper is a combination of laser and synchrotron data to plot spectra along the Fermi surface from the nodal region to the antinodal region)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At a glance it looks like they have a "psuedo" band gap .

Since the laser imparts negligible linear momentum, the laser excited electron from below to above the band gap must have the same linear momentum. This is because the transition matrix element (going back to Fermi's rule here)

<psi(k_initial,E_initial)|laser|psi(k_final,E_final)>

is always zero except when k_initial = k_final. This restricts the allowed transitions, and is especially noticeable for single crystals.

The core states excited by x-rays in ARPES experiments are a linear combo of momentum eigen states. That is the transition matrix element

<psi(k_core,E_core)|laser|psi(k_final,E_final)>

will always be none zero because psi(k_core,E_core) has a component along almost every possible final state.
 
The maximum momentum you can reach is k=2 pi/lambda, where lambda is the wave length of the light.

Laser light is typically visible with wave lengths of 300 nm and above, synchrotron "light" is typically soft or hard x-rays, i.e. wave lengths of 20 Angstroms or less.

Brightness has nothing to do with this. In fact, lasers have much higher brightness than synchrotrons. There is a lot of work going on these days on developing x-ray free electron lasers to get the best of both worlds.
 
Thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K