Laser to burn insect

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of using lasers to kill insects on human skin without causing burns. Key points include the difficulty in identifying an ideal wavelength that effectively targets insects while being safe for human skin. Concerns about eye safety and the potential dangers of lasers are emphasized, as they can easily cause harm if mismanaged. The conversation highlights the need for strict safety measures and regulatory standards when dealing with lasers. Overall, while the concept is intriguing, practical and safety challenges make it problematic.
Bilan
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
What would be the ideal wavelength and power of a laser to kill an insect on human skin without burning the skin ?
 
  • Like
  • Skeptical
Likes Rive and Dale
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think the characteristics of the laser are almost inconsequential. If you can manage to target an insect on the skin, you can pretty easily hit it with a pulse that's so short it will fry the bug without any damage to the skin.

Consider, all you have to do is disable a wing or other body part, which is on the order of nanolitres of fluid. And patch of skin has many orders of magnitude more heat absorbency than that.

I think your challenges will be more in the area of targeting and safety. (How will you prevent eye damage?)
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and Bilan
Thread is closed temporarily for Moderation.
 
  • Like
Likes Bilan
Welcome to PF. :smile:

Bilan said:
What would be the ideal wavelength and power of a laser to kill an insect on human skin without burning the skin ?
There are several problems with this idea. First, it may not be possible to find some ideal wavelength that affects the insect much faster and easier than human skin.

But the bigger problem is that lasers can be very dangerous to our eyesight, and lasers that have any power at all need to be managed to minimize/eliminate that danger. You can't just have an instrument on the wall of your home that will detect insects and shoot bursts of laser light at them to disable/kill them. It is way too easy in such a situation for the laser light to make it into a person's eye either directly or via a reflection (like off of a watch or piece of jewelry). In fact, there are regulatory standards for the safety measures that must be taken when working around different strengths of lasers:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_safety

So since there is a lot of danger involved in the idea and the discussion, this thread will need to remain closed. Keep thinking of creative ideas, though, since your ideas will get better and better the more of them you have. Just be sure to consider things like safety and practicality when doing your brainstorming. :wink:

EDIT/ADD -- If you have any questions about laser safety standards or about your idea, please feel free to send me a Personal Message (PM) by clicking on my avatar twice and "Start a Conversation".
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
509
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top