Lattice constant of martensite?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter erin85
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Lattice
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the lattice constant of martensitic iron, specifically its bct crystal structure. The participant, Erin, identifies a lattice constant of 2.8553 for ferrite (bcc) and approximately 3.66 for austenite (fcc). It is concluded that martensite in pure iron will exhibit a bcc configuration, with the bct deformation attributed to carbon atoms. The authoritative references for further reading are Wechsler et al. (1953) and Lieberman et al. (1955).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of martensitic transformation in iron
  • Familiarity with crystal structures: bcc and fcc
  • Knowledge of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations
  • Basic principles of phase transitions in materials science
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Wechsler, Lieberman, and Read (1953) paper on martensite formation
  • Study the effects of carbon on the bct deformation in martensitic steel
  • Learn about molecular dynamics simulations specific to phase transitions
  • Explore the relationship between heat treatment and lattice constants in steels
USEFUL FOR

Materials scientists, metallurgists, and researchers involved in the study of phase transformations in iron and steel, particularly those focusing on martensitic structures.

erin85
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone-

I am trying to run some MD simulations of martensitic iron. I am having a lot of trouble finding a lattice constant anywhere in the literature... I know the crystal structure is bct, so there will be some c/a ratio as well... any suggestions?

Erin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have done a little bit more research... but I am not well versed enough in steels to figure out if what I am saying is true.

I want to research the transition from austenite (fcc) to martensite. The potential I am using was written for ferrite (bcc), with a lattice constant of 2.8553, but I think it will still be stable for austentite. Doing a lowest energy calculation, I figured out the lattice constant for fcc is about 3.66.

Now, if I am simulating pure Fe, with no carbon, is it correct that the martensite will have a bcc configuration? I believe the bct deformation is caused by carbon atoms not fitting in properly... if so, then I can create an interface between some fcc and bcc, and let it run, and this would effectively simulate a austenitic/martensitic boundary. Does this seem correct?
 
I don't think you will find a useful c/a in literature because this is a strong function of composition and heat treatment (which means there's non-equilibrium weirdness hidden in it - probably from diffusion of C)!

The authoritative reference is supposed to be: Wechsler, M. S., Lieberman, D. S., and Read, T. A., “On the Theory of the Formation of Martensite,” AIME Trans. J. Metals 197, 1503 (1953).

If that's hard to access, try: S. Lieberman, M. S. Wechsler, and T. A. Read, J. Appl. Phys. 26, 473 (1955)
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
998
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K