Law of Total Probability/Bayes' Theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter XodoX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Theorem
XodoX
Messages
195
Reaction score
0
Can somebody explain to me, using an example, what those 2 theorems actually are? Like, when I see a problem, how do I know what I'm going to use?

I know Total Probability is "unconditional Probability", but I don't really get that.

Supose that F1, F2...Fn are events such that Fi\bigcapFj=∅ whenever i≠j and F1\bigcup...\bigcupFn=S. Then for any event E,

P(E)= P(E I F1) P(F1)+...+P(E I Fn) P(Fn).
Bayes' is for conditional probabilities, but apparently you calculate those conditional probabilities differently...

For any events E and F, the conditional probabilities P( E I F) and P(F I E) are connected by the following formula:

P(E I F)=P(F I E) P(E)/P(F)

The other definition of conditional probability was P(E I F)= P(E\bigcapF)/P(F). Can't figure out what the difference is, when I use which one..etc.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Supose that F1, F2...Fn are events such that Fi⋂Fj=∅ whenever i≠j and F1⋃...⋃Fn=S. Then for any event E,

P(E)= P(E I F1) P(F1)+...+P(E I Fn) P(Fn).

A lot of the time in probability problems it's easiest to break down the problem into mutually exclusive cases and deal with them separately. Like what's the probability that the sum of two dice is less than 6?

P(X1 + X2 ≤ 6) = P(X2≤5)P(X1=1) + P(X2≤4)P(X1=2) + P(X2≤3)P(X1=4) +P(X2≤2)P(X1=4) +P(X2≤1)P(X1=5)

So above in the sum you break down the cases based on the result of the first die.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top