Laws of area and conservation of momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the equation for dθ in the context of the laws of area. The original poster struggles with the formula provided in their textbook, which relates dθ to x, y, dx, and dy. A participant clarifies that dθ can be derived from the relationship between polar coordinates and Cartesian coordinates, emphasizing that the formula for dθ is well-defined regardless of angle assignment conventions. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding differentiation in this context, with the original poster eventually realizing the need to differentiate θ directly. The discussion concludes with acknowledgment of the complexity involved in parametric methods when dealing with products of x and y.
almo
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
i am having problem getting the dθ in the laws of area.

what the textbook states is,
dθ=

xdy-ydx
x2+y2

I can't get the equation..
the only thing i could think of is trigo functions, but i got stuck...
any help?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
almo,

laws of area and conservation of momentum

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i am having problem getting the dθ in the laws of area.

what the textbook states is,
dθ=

xdy-ydx
x2+y2

I can't get the equation..
the only thing i could think of is trigo functions, but i got stuck...
any help?

What are you trying to do? What are the "laws of area". What equation are you trying to find? How does the conservation of momentum fit into this?

Ratch
 
"Laws of Area" is vague, but the formula for dtheta is straightforward.

\theta = \arctan (y/x)+C

Here C is an additive constant that depends on 1. Which region of the plane you are in, and 2. How you assign angles to points in the plane. For example, if you define theta to be between 0 and 2pi, then C=0 for (x,y) in the first quadrant, C=pi in the second and third quadrants, and C=2pi in the fourth quadrant. If you define theta to lie between -pi and +pi, then C works differently. But all that is irrelevant, because even though theta as a function of x and y has some ambiguity, no matter what your convention is for assigning angles to points, dtheta is well defined by the formula:

d\theta = \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial x} dx +\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial y}dy

There are ways to derive the formula for dtheta without relying on a formula for theta as a function of x and y. For example, no matter how you assign angles, you have:

x=r\cos(\theta), \hspace{1cm} y=r\sin(\theta).

Use these formulas to calculate dx and dy as linear functions of dr and dtheta (with a basepoint understood to be fixed). You get:

dx = (x/r)dr -yd\theta,\hspace{1cm} dy= (y/r)dr+xd\theta.

Multiply the first equation by y, the second equation by x and subtract to obtain:
ydx - xdy = -(y^2+x^2)d\theta =-r^2d\theta
Dividing out the - (r squared) gives you the formula for dtheta.
 
Last edited:
Thanks vargo!.. I figure out to just differentiate theta, which gives me the equation. I am too use to differentiate something against something else, that I forget about some basic stuff.

The parametric method seems quite confusing when multiplication of x and y is involved though, but its brilliant.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Back
Top